[x]
Posted via EE Mobile

Search, ask, and monitor your questions on the go with EE Mobile. Visit Experts Exchange from your mobile device and never be out of touch again.

09/20/2009 at 06:15PM PDT, ID: 24747256
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

9.2

Will I get a different result by synching two ACT! databases then I would from merging them?

Asked by sexygeek in ACT, Databases Miscellaneous

Tags: ACT!, Synchronizing ACT!, Merging ACT!

I have a customer who has been uing ACT! for years.  He and his partner had been using the same databse together until 6 months ago but had to practice separately since then (basically their real estate related business went into the dumps for awhile).  Now they'd like to merge the data from both databases (and add a third user).  They both upgraded to ACT! 2010 and bought a third license.  We tried the merge using the instructions available on the Sage site.  It basically went well but, here and there, certain items (some groups - which they use a little strangely) disappeared.  So we restored the database and are looking for another way to merge the data.  

Both databases are structured exactly the same.  Also, just so you know they actually merged, notes from both partners appeared where appropriate in recent clients.

So my question is: Would we get a different result by doing it as a synchronization or is it really just the same thing underneath.  If I had to guess, I would think both processes boil down to MS SQL stored procedures.  If they are just different ways of doing the same thing then we would be wasting our time.  

Any ideas from you experts would be better than trial and error.
[+][-]09/20/09 06:29 PM, ID: 25379776

View this solution now by starting your 30-day free trial. Setting up your free trial is quick, easy, and secure. We will return you to this solution, unlocked, when you're done.

 

About this solution

Zones: ACT, Databases Miscellaneous
Tags: ACT!, Synchronizing ACT!, Merging ACT!
Sign Up Now!
Solution Provided By: GLComputing
Participating Experts: 1
Solution Grade: A
 
 
[+][-]09/20/09 07:47 PM, ID: 25380018

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 30-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]09/20/09 08:43 PM, ID: 25380180

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 30-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
 
Loading Advertisement...
20091111-EE-VQP-91 - Hierarchy / EE_QW_3_20080625