Question

WHICH DATABASE IS THE BEST (for server side or client side) ?

Asked by: WolfgangKoenig

Criterions of choice:

1) Very good performance in a client/server environment
   (Especially db transactions and search requests)

2) The server side db can handle concurrently client requests

3) The client side db user licence should't be very expensive

4) The db should support replication mechanisms

5) The client side db should be also available when the server is offline. Therefore special replication mechanisms are needed

6) The db should be support common db interfaces (ODBC/SQL)

7) The db should be easily to access from a common programming language environment (Java/Delphi/VB/C++ ...)


What are your recommendations for such a database ?

Best regards
WoK

This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.

Subscribe now for full access to Experts Exchange and get

Instant Access to this Solution

  • Plus...
  • 30 Day FREE access, no risk, no obligation
  • Collaborate with the world's top tech experts
  • Unlimited access to our exclusive solution database
  • Never be left without tech help again

Subscribe Now

Asked On
2001-10-24 at 05:54:38ID20207087
Tags

offline

Topic

Databases Miscellaneous

Participating Experts
13
Points
150
Comments
28

Trusted by hundreds of thousands everyday for fast, accurate and reliable tech support.

  • "The time we save is the biggest benefit of Experts Exchange to Warner Bros. What could take multiple guys 2 hours or more each to find is accessed in around 15 minutes on Experts Exchange." Mike Kapnisakis, Warner Bros.
  • "Our team likes having a resource that is more secure than just using Google and most experts using this service really know their stuff. It's nice to look here first versus using Google." Dayna Sellner, Lockheed Martin
  • "Anytime that I've been stumped with a problem, 9 out of 10 times Experts Exchange has either the accepted solution or an open discussion of the potential solution to the problem." Kenny Red, eBay Inc.

See what Experts Exchange can do for you.

Got a question?

We've got the answer.

Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.

Screenshot of Experts Exchange Knowledgebase

Need individual assistance?

Our experts are ready to help.

If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.

Screenshot of Experts Exchange Knowledgebase

Want to learn from the best?

Read articles from industry experts.

Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.

Screenshot of an Article

Working on a long term project?

Store your work and research.

Save solutions to your questions, answers you’ve discovered through searching plus helpful articles in your personal knowledgebase for easy future access.

Screenshot of Experts Exchange Knowledgebase

Access the answers to your technology questions today.

Subscribe Now

30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.

What Makes Experts Exchange Unique?

Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Trusted by the world's most respected brands.

image of each brand's logo

Faithfully serving IT professionals since 1996.

Experts Exchange Logo

Try it out and discover for yourself.

Subscribe Now

30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.

Related Solutions

  1. Delphi without ODBC?
    Hi, I have a question: Can i connect to Oracle DB without ODBC by Delphi? Thkn
  2. info needed ASAP! DELPHI licence
    Hi! I just need info: can Delphi be used for educational purposes without any licence (in other words - for free)? WBR, W_Fox
  3. ODBC in Delphi
    What is the best approch to use ODBC in delphi, regarless of the DB i'm using (Access, Oracle, SQL-Server...etc)? ie: is there a way to directly communicate with "odbc32.dll" (or is it transparent)? I need to make selects,updates,inserts etc... to my Data Source (...
  4. ODBC-IN DELPHI VER 3
    HOW TO CONNECT TO DATABASE THROUGH ODBC CONNECTIVITY IN DELPHI VER 3? AND WHAT IS THE BACK DROP OF USING THE ODBC CONNECTIVITY?
  5. Delphi + ODBC ..BDE and MS access
    can someone give me the best description on how to make an access database work great in Delphi? stian
  6. DSN connection to an access databas
    I need example code of how to connect(through DSN)to an access databas(access 2000). I need too to show information from this databas(e.g economy.mdb) in text fields in a form. P.S. I know how to create the data name source through the control panel in windows.Thanks.

Free Tech Articles

  1. WARNING: 5 Reasons why you should NEVER fix a computer for free.
    It is in our nature to love the puzzle. We are obsessed. The lot of us. We love puzzles. We love the challenge. We thrive on finding the answer. We hate disarray. It bothers us deep in our soul. W...
  2. SCCM OSD Basic troubleshooting
    SCCM 2007 OSD is a fantastic way to deploy operating systems, however, like most things SCCM issues can sometimes be difficult to resolve due to the sheer volume of logs to sift through and the dispe...
  3. Migrate Small Business Server 2003 to Exchange 2010 and Windows 2008 R2
    This guide is intended to provide step by step instructions on how to migrate from Small Business Server 2003 to Windows 2008 R2 with Exchange 2010. For this migration to work you will need the fo...
  4. Create a Win7 Gadget
    This article shows you how to create a simple "Gadget" -- a sort of mini-application supported by Windows 7 and Vista. Gadgets can be dropped anywhere on the desktop to provide instant information, ...
  5. Outlook continually prompting for username and password
    There have been a lot of questions recently regarding Outlook prompting for a username and password whilst using Exchange 2007. There are a few reasons why this would happen and I will try to cover t...
  6. Backup Exchange 2010 Information Store using Windows Backup
    There seems to be quite a lot of confusion around the ability to backup Exchange 2010 using the built in Windows Backup feature. This stems from the omission of this feature prior to Exchange 2007 s...

Cloud Class Webinars

  1. Avoiding Bugs in Microsoft Access
    Alison Balter takes and in-depth look at avoiding bugs in Access. In this webinar you will learn about using the immediate window to debug your applications, invoking the debugger, using breakpoints to troubleshoot, stepping through code, setting the next statement to execute, ...
  2. Top 10 Best New Features in Visio 2010
    Scott Helmers gives live demonstrations of the top 10 new features in Visio 2010. This webinar will teach you how to create compelling diagrams by adding shapes to the page with a single click, linking the shapes in a diagram to data in Excel (or SQL Server, or SharePoint), ...
  3. IT Consultant Business Secrets Revealed
    Michael Munger, Experts Exchange tech pro and IT consultant, pulls back the curtain on his very successful businesses and answers question on every IT consultant and business owner should know about. He shares secrets on what he did to solve the 5 most common problems in IT, ...
  4. Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity
    Quest CTO, Mike Billon, gives an overview of the steps involved in building a dunamic disaster recovery plan. Through case studies and an examination of software/hardware tooles for monitoring and testing, you'll gain a better understandin of where you are, where you want ...
  5. Organize Your Visio Diagrams with Containers and Lists
    Scott Helmers uses cross functional flowcharts, wireframe diagrams, data graphic legends and seating charts to teach you: how to ustilize all three new structured diagram components in Visio 2010, the best practices for organizeing shapes in previous version of Visio, how to organize ...
  6. How to Us Objects, Properties, Events and Methods in Microsoft Access
    Alison Dalter gives an in-depbth look at objects, properties, events and methods in Microsoft Access. In this webinar you will learn about using the object browser, referring to objects, working with properties and methods, working with object variables, understanding the ...

Join the Community

Give a Little. Get a Lot.

Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.

Join the Community

Answers

 

by: YodaMagePosted on 2001-10-24 at 06:07:08ID: 6570798

I would say to look into either InterBase or MySQL.

 

by: cybermoonlightPosted on 2001-10-24 at 06:23:52ID: 6570856

Or Oracle if u have the money :(

 

by: WolfgangKoenigPosted on 2001-10-24 at 06:46:23ID: 6570947

YodaMage:
How expensive is a InterBase license for a client ?

cybermoonlight:
Yeah, but the price for the license ...

 

by: angelIIIPosted on 2001-10-24 at 07:03:03ID: 6570994

Regarding 1), more important than the database system is the application and database design.

2) Any larger database system can handle this
3) For large database systems, you can have per-server or per-processor licences rather than CALs...

4) OK for larger db's ...
5) Thus you need locally stored data. This requires indeed some special replication, but i guess that normal merge replication ...

6) OK for almost all the db's. BTW, SQL Server and Oracle (and certainly others too) support the new interface, OLEDB which is (promised) faster, stabler etc...

7) If you access using ODBC (or OLEDB), the application doesn't matter?!

Until now, there is no definite choice using your requirements...

 

by: WolfgangKoenigPosted on 2001-10-24 at 07:20:26ID: 6571035

angelIII:
3) A per-server licence means (for instance) that i pay  for one oracle db server and all depending oracle clients that use my application are free of charge ?

 

by: angelIIIPosted on 2001-10-24 at 07:21:49ID: 6571041

Regarding 1), more important than the database system is the application and database design.

2) Any larger database system can handle this
3) For large database systems, you can have per-server or per-processor licences rather than CALs...

4) OK for larger db's ...
5) Thus you need locally stored data. This requires indeed some special replication, but i guess that normal merge replication ...

6) OK for almost all the db's. BTW, SQL Server and Oracle (and certainly others too) support the new interface, OLEDB which is (promised) faster, stabler etc...

7) If you access using ODBC (or OLEDB), the application doesn't matter?!

Until now, there is no definite choice using your requirements...

 

by: angelIIIPosted on 2001-10-24 at 07:23:05ID: 6571049

Sorry for the double post...

Yes!

 

by: JoebobPosted on 2001-10-24 at 13:37:25ID: 6573707

Price depends on the number of clients you will be using.  An example is the per processor price for SQL Server Standard is $4999, but the regular price is $1489 with 5 CALs and additional CALs are about $152 each.  This means that you would need more than 28 concurrent users before the per processor licensing is cheaper.  Also remember that most large databases are licensed per concurrent user meaning that if you have 50 users, but only 25 are using it at one time, you only need 25 licenses.

As far as databases that would meet your needs: Sql Server, Oracle, DB2, Interbase, etc., etc., etc.

For the clients to have data even if the server is down, you want merge replication or updatable subscription replication.  Either will work, but the appropriate choice would depend on your application structure and requirements.

 

by: egomasterPosted on 2001-10-24 at 17:31:58ID: 6574523

maybe a mixed solution?

I know of a few applications that use SQL Server on the server and has custom made modules which "checks out" data (or just flags data as shared) to a local Access DB (hate to call Access a DB, but...) which is then used by clients when offline.

This combines the advantages of a large DB system (i.e. SQL Server in this case) and cheap client licences for client DBs (Access is included in all(?) office installations).

The drawback is that you have to custom make the replication application unless you have a simple DB model and simple work flow in your application.

 

by: ZANTARPosted on 2001-10-24 at 23:47:43ID: 6575574

In my experience, I have worked with 3 databases in depth.
I will rank them from small applications to large applications.

MS Access, MS SQL Server/Oracle Standard Edition, Oracle Enterprise Edition.

This is my personal opinon and I'm sure others might agree/disagree.

MS Access is great for small desktop applications which don't need lots of networking and doesn't need to store lots of data. I have found that a maximum of 5 concurrent users can use Access with no ill-effects. Also, there is a limit on the amount of data it can hold which is 2 gigs.

MS SQL Server and Oracle Standard edition are more of a mid size RDBMS. They both can do the backups, storing gigs of data and have performance tuning ability.

MS SQL Server has a lot of nice wizards to speed up the administration of the database, however, Oracle allows you to do all the custom changes ( but not as many wizards).

As for the Oracle Enterprise Edition, you can get into partitioning (splitting up) of table's storage over many different hard drives. This way you can turn on/off parts of a table's data if it is not needed. So instead of deleting the data, just take it offline until it is needed. This improves SQL performance a lot.

Hope this helps.

 

by: angelIIIPosted on 2001-10-24 at 23:47:49ID: 6575594

FYI: If you have SQL Server as your main server, rather that using Access (which isn't a DB), use the free MSDE database, which has the same engine as SQL Server...

CHeers

 

by: WolfgangKoenigPosted on 2001-10-25 at 01:46:19ID: 6576155

Joebob:
What are a CALs = 1 concurrent users?

egomaster:
The DB model and work flow is unfortunately not very simple

ZANTAR:
How are the licence prices between Oracle and MS SQL Server ?

angelIII:
What stands MSDE database for?

Thanks for all comments!

 

by: angelIIIPosted on 2001-10-25 at 01:58:53ID: 6576183

CAL = Client Access License

MSDE = Micro$oft Data Engine. In short, it's the same engine that MS SQL Server 7, using the same services, database files and interface (ODBC/OLEDB). The differences:
free, but some technical limitations like filesize is smaller... other thing is that the Enterprise Manager doesnt come with it neither, but you can use the Enterprise Manager to connect to the MSDE installation.

To compare the prices, you should ask your local vendors for Oracle and MSSQL Server licences, as the prices can vary... On the internet you might find some good indications too.

CHeers

 

by: egomasterPosted on 2001-10-25 at 02:10:09ID: 6576198

Angellll:
Well... You learn something everyday... MSDE is obviously a better alternative than Access.

WolfgangKoenig:
If you have a complex application/workflow my guess is you have to make your own application specific synchronization engine. If you can avoid this - good, but I'm afraid you won't be able to...

 

by: paul13Posted on 2001-10-25 at 02:20:38ID: 6576222

postGRE has most of the features of the more expensive databases, and is free.

MySQL is fine, but lacks stored procedures.

Don't pay for a database!!!!!!!

 

by: JoebobPosted on 2001-10-25 at 06:27:27ID: 6578940

If you use MSDE on the clients and SQL Server 2000 on the main server, you can setup Merge Replication between the clients and server.  Merge Replication is a system that allows multiple databases to be kept in sync.  It has some problems, such as it doesn't remember transactional boundaries, but with proper planning this is less of an issue.  The nice thing is that you can use a system that is already written rather than write your own synchronization method.

Regarding the "free" databases, I don't personnaly like them.  With free software, you have no structured support network.  You have to either search the net to find solutions to problems or pay a contractor to come in and fix your problems.  I only use "free" software in 2 cases: if it is simple and includes source code, or if I have no other choice due to budget constraints.

CAL does indead mean Client Access License.  With SQL Server you will need one for every concurrent user unless you get the per-processor license.

Oracle pricing versus SQL Server: Oracle is generally twice the price of SQL Server, but it is arguably a more capable/flexible DBMS.  One advantage with Oracle is that the server doesn't have to be a Windows Server, it could be a Unix server farm if you want.

 

by: bikiPosted on 2001-10-25 at 17:27:19ID: 6589475

Ever heard of INFORMIX? To me this is the best DBMS around-server & Client.Very much tied to UNIX though.And i also think it is a bit cheaper since it not as resource hungry as ORACLE.

 

by: razvypPosted on 2001-10-26 at 07:00:41ID: 6594514

I recommend Interbase/Firebird..
It's free, it's fast and very reliable and very small footprint (works very well with 4 MB RAM).
And also due to its MGA (Multi Generation Architecture) its very fast on reads, because it does not lock on reads (also much smaller log).
Good support for replication.
One of the most used DB for developement with Delphi.

If you want commercial support Borland has the commercial version (but it costs :(..)

At least it should worth a try..

 

by: WolfgangKoenigPosted on 2001-10-26 at 07:20:43ID: 6595794

 

by: WolfgangKoenigPosted on 2001-10-26 at 07:22:13ID: 6595894

Thanx biki and razwp ;)

 

by: YodaMagePosted on 2001-10-26 at 11:29:25ID: 6601017

Interbase is also free. It has Triggers, stored procedures, roles, user defined functions, etc...

 

by: cubudPosted on 2001-10-29 at 14:12:57ID: 6602322

Interbase is not free.

Free interbase is called Firebird.  Look at www.IBPhoenix.com which has the server + client + odbc all free.

To allow offline editing you will need to use MIDAS.  You can edit like a normal table, then save to file and load from file.  Finally when connected to the server you can ApplyUpdates.

I think a MIDAS license is something like $2500 per server.

Pete
====
http://www.HowToDoThings.com (Delphi aritcles)
http://www.Stuckindoors.com/Delphi (Open source graphics, sound, and FastStrings library)

 

by: WolfgangKoenigPosted on 2001-10-31 at 02:15:14ID: 6603686

Thanks for all comments !)

Someone here who have experiences with Sybase?
What is the greater/better dbms mysql or firebird (interbase)?

This thread is a good guide for all users that have to set up a dbms!

Cheers
WoK

 

by: razvypPosted on 2001-10-31 at 03:02:38ID: 6603748

MySQL versus  Interbase (or PostgreSQL) is a  never-ending
debate.
They are different tools with different purposes.
MySQL is simple, fast, but no enterprise functionality (transactions, stored procedures, triggers, subqueries, declarative referential integrity, ...)

Interbase (and PostgreSQL) are a bit slower because they offer that functionality.

The choice depends on what we want the most (data integrity versus slower speed). Also if your DB contains more than 10 tables than referential integrity becomes a serious problem and nobody recommends to manage it only in your application (without some kind of DB checks), even if it is slower.
Remember, the data you save in the DB are your more precious value, because if something is wrong it will cost you the most to repair

 

by: ramyPosted on 2001-11-02 at 09:47:51ID: 6614251

I agree with biki that INFORMIX is the best choice for you.

Sybase is not the best choice.

I don't know which is greater/better dbms mysql or firebird (interbase)

Anyways whatever your choice at last tell us and tell us why :)

Ramy...

 

by: YodaMagePosted on 2002-01-08 at 06:36:06ID: 6717824

I have to laugh at one point made in the accepted answer here, that open source software has less support.

Microsoft products cost a great deal of $$$, and M$ support flat out sucks. Many people pay for Crystal Reports, take a poll on what people think of Seagate Support. I believe the newsgroups like borland.opensource or tamarack associates have more info readily available than most commercial products.

(BTW,opensource means that it comes with source code)

 

by: NelsonRPosted on 2003-01-03 at 15:33:36ID: 7665701

I've worked with Interbase and MySQL for quite some time.. off the top of my head:

MySQL:
-Lots of data types
-Lots of functions
-Autoincrement columns
-Runs on many platforms (typical of open source)

-Simple, fast, but limited

Interbase:
-Essential data types.. BLOB type can be just about anything
-Limited core functions, but extensible (UDFLib, etc)
-Generators, but with triggers you could have them act as autoincrement (before insert, if id is null, increment generator and set id to that)
-Runs on many platforms

-Stored procedures
-Triggers (I'd say this should be basic in most DBs)
-Views

Indeed there is a free version of Interbase.  That is version 6.0 when Borland made the code available to the public.. They soon changed their mind and came out with 6.5 and 7.0 with closed source.  Firebird is building on the 6.0 code.  They attempt to make it compatible with Interbase and are porting the code to C++.

http://firebird.sourceforge.net/index.php?op=guide&id=ib6_techspec has a lot more info.  I think Firebird will more than suit your needs.  It is free, open source, has much of the "basic advanced" functionality and more, cross-platform, fast, fairly simple but powerful.

 

by: tlfeetPosted on 2003-02-21 at 13:47:10ID: 7995705

Q about Microsoft - SQL Server
has to do with cost - long-term
We use accounting/database package called Navision (Financials) Microsoft bought the company.
Yearly maintenance/update fees are exhorbitant as it is.
Now MS has reconfiged pricing poilices, one of the kickers is:
If you do not pay yearly fess then down the road you cannot buy additional CAL nor additional mdoules.
(Also not eligible to upgrade to newer versions etc.)
MS has done this with Solomon & couple of other programs/companies they bought.
In other words, you don't buy it, you rent it.

Question is: say someone goes with SQL Server, MS "business plan" is to do what it did with Navision to all products - so a year or 2 SQL Server users are faced with paying yearly fees to MS to have the right to pay for additonal licenses, updates, upgrades, etc.

Thoughts?

20120131-EE-VQP-002

3 Ways to Join

30-Day Free Trial

The Experts

98% positive feedback on 31,087 answers since March 2000. angeliii is a Microsoft Most Valuable Professional for his work with MS SQL Server & Develoment.

He has also proven his knowledge of Visual Basic Programming, PHP Scripting and Oracle Databases.

The Experts

97% positive feedback on 10,752 answers since July 2000. lrmoore has more than 18 years experience in the networking industry.

The six-time Mircosoft MVPs specialties include firewalls, virtual private networking, and network management.

Testimonials

"...and excellent source for support... Kind of like having your very own IT dept." Electriciansnet

Testimonials

"I was apprehensive at signing up at first. However... it has already made my life as an IT administrator much easier." JaCrews

Testimonials

"WOW! You guys have great, active, and knowledgeable people on here." moore50

Business Clients

Business Clients

In the Press

"If you’ve got a question... Experts Exchange can supply an answer.”

In the Press

"...an invaluable aid for both IT professionals and those who require tech support."

In the Press

"where IT professionals provide quick answers on just about any topic"

Business Account Plans

Loading Advertisement...