[x]
Posted via EE Mobile

Search, ask, and monitor your questions on the go with EE Mobile. Visit Experts Exchange from your mobile device and never be out of touch again.

Question
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

9.4

CPU bound

Asked by rstaveley in PostgreSQL Database

Tags: cpu, postgresql, bound

I have a 48M PostgreSQL database on a 2GB dedicated Linux server with one CPU. It is taking a pounding and I've seeing very sluggish performance. Due to the importance of the load (it's the run up to a live event and that's the reason for the traffic), I want to do as limited experimentation as possible.

It's not too bad here...

top - 23:26:38 up 144 days, 10:26,  4 users,  load average: 1.35, 1.21, 1.10
Tasks:  75 total,   2 running,  73 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
Cpu(s):  0.0% us,  0.0% sy,  0.0% ni, 99.7% id,  0.0% wa,  0.3% hi,  0.0% si
Mem:   3631740k total,  1969348k used,  1662392k free,    92852k buffers
Swap:  4008120k total,        0k used,  4008120k free,  1757768k cached

...but I've seen those load averages get up to > 5.0 for long periods, and yes it *is* postmaster munching the mips :-(

The postgresql.conf file has been set up with defaults, and I'm planning to apply the following changes:

  #shared_buffers = 1000          # min 16, at least max_connections*2, 8KB each
  shared_buffers = 8192            # Rob S. 2006-11-17 - it is only a 50M data set, but we can spare 64M of RAM
  #vacuum_mem = 8192           # min 1024, size in KB
  vacuum_mem = 16384            # Rob S. 2006-11-17 - 16MB
  #effective_cache_size = 1000    # typically 8KB each
  effective_cache_size = 10240    # Rob S. This is 80M, which is plenty for our 50M database!

The database is: PostgreSQL 8.1.4 on i386-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC cc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-13)

I have never vacuumed. I'm assume that PostgreSQL does that for me now.

Here are my questions:

(1) Are these sane changes and in any way likely to reduce the CPU load?

(2) Would explicit VACUUMing be worth it?
[+][-]11/18/06 07:59 AM, ID: 17971717Accepted Solution

View this solution now by starting your 30-day free trial. Setting up your free trial is quick, easy, and secure. We will return you to this solution, unlocked, when you're done.

About this solution

Zone: PostgreSQL Database
Tags: cpu, postgresql, bound
Sign Up Now!
Solution Provided By: earthman2
Participating Experts: 1
Solution Grade: A
 
[+][-]11/18/06 05:26 AM, ID: 17971344Expert Comment

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 30-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]11/18/06 08:40 AM, ID: 17971810Author Comment

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 30-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]11/18/06 10:28 AM, ID: 17972102Expert Comment

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 30-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]11/18/06 10:47 AM, ID: 17972143Author Comment

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 30-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]11/18/06 11:56 AM, ID: 17972304Author Comment

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 30-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
 
Loading Advertisement...
20091111-EE-VQP-92