OK how about defining 2 new metrics:
One with a filter condition handling all outliers, one with a filter condition handling all values within scale.
Then you can use both metrics in your report.
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsHi everybody,
I have a question since I'm going to set up a report using filter but I'm running into issues because I want to display my sample size N. More details:
Assume having an attribute which is a measurement with a range from -1000 to 1000. The metric for this attribute measurement counts the number of values for each measurement value. So measurement is like -1000, -999, -998......998, 999, 1000. Combined with the metric: -1000 -> 10, -999 -> 0, 199 -> 10...1000 -> 0. If the metric results are displayed you get a distribution or histogram which tells you whether you measurement is within specific limits - lets say the limits are between -100 and 100. All the values beyond -100 and 100 are outliers.
What I want to do: I want to display only the distribution of values between -100 and 100 in a graph and table view. But I want to know how many values are not within the limits.
So I assumed it might be right not to set a report filter but set a view filter. According to the manual the view filter leads to a metric calculation for all values between -1000 and 1000 and not only between -100 and 100. How can I count AND display within my report the whole sample size of counted values between -1000 and 1000 which is the real sample size?
Any suggestions are appreciated!
Nicole
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
Hi Tolomir,
I've tried what you suggested. I've created two metrics:
1. One with filter for values within the range of -100 to 100
2. One with filter for values outside range of -100 to 100
Result: Report return no data.
Seems like the metrics exclude each other and nothing is displayed in the report.
I found something different where I thought it could work but is does not. I have only one attribute within my report and normally one metric. When defining a metric there is level and grouping information within the editor which you can set to absolute, ignore none for a certain attribute. In case I set the level to "absolute" for the attribute I use it does not calculate the unfiltered or not displayed value like it should. Within the tutorial they use two attributes where one is a child of the other. That's currently not what I have in my report. My attribute is "valueRange" for values between -1000 and 1000 e.g. and a metric which counts how many values are within each "valueRange bucket".
There's one report in the tutorial which is doing nearly what I want to do: Reports->MicroStrategy Platform Capabilities -> Advanced Metrics -> Level Metrics -> Report: Revenue by Geography
The difference to my report: Instead of 2 attributes I have 3 attributes in my report. Two I use as page-by, the other attribute as a column. The hierarchy is like in the Tutorial report: page-by attribute1 is parent of page-by attribute2 and attribute2 is parent of column attribute3. The current failures in my report: All columns are filled with the total value and the report filter is not applied to the view. I have two metrics: One should just apply the filter for attribute3 where the values are between -100 and 100 and the other one should ignore the filter and deliver a sum of attribute3 values between -1000 and 1000. The page by function should be applied as well. I'm working on it. Step by step I get closer but the result is still not ok.
Ok I did talk to the teacher today.
He said might might want to create 2 reports and join them in a document. Create 2 metrics with a filter.
---
Could you upload the result as excel file so I could play with it a bit next week. (Also some source data would be suffient. Also switch to sql mode and c&p the result here, I guess it will help me more to understand.)
Gonna check that example next week.
Hi,
I see this report in Microstrategy still I don't understand what attributes you use instead.
Could you provide me with some example please ( a excel sheet with a sample of the raw data)
Also a sample of the resulting report - just a few lines with explanations of the attributes and metrics
Right now this is too abstract for me to think about a solution.
Thank you,
Tolomir
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: TolomirPosted on 2008-12-02 at 06:32:46ID: 23077092
I'm right now defining some metrics myself, but your problem seems to be a bit more complicated.
I take a look at it now. My 1st idea using thresholds is wrong....