babaganoosh,
Try these;
http: / / downloads. subratam. org/ WinsockFix. zip
http: / / windowsxp. mvps. org/ IEFIX. htm
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsI am running into loads Dell XP machines that are around 3 years old that are running slow. Not so much malware, but I feel, just an overall malaise or windows bloat. But clients are not understanding / unwilling to accept that... that after this amount of time, the OS could / should be refreshed as a way to get the speed back on the machine?
I'll typically uninstall unwanted apps, remove temp files, clean and optimize the registry, defragment the hard drive, etc. and the machine still isn't working very good. these are machines that are typically 3 GHz, with 512 MB or 1 gig of ram, lots of free space on the hard drive, etc. overall, a nice machine, other than it's slow - which I attribute to windows bloat (I thought I heard a cute phrase for that?). even uninstalling apps, there's things left in the registry? Thumb drives load drivers that stay around long after the thumb drive isn't being used? every ative x or java applet that was loaded on a website stays in IE? (see tools, programs, manage add-ons?).
but then do you backup all the data, reinstall the OS, apply all the patches (76+ when updating a new install of SP2 (yeah, I guess I should make a slip streamed disk with more updates?!), reinstall the apps and data, you hav a nicely running machine... that is out of warrantee, the power supply, mobo, drives, etc are all 3 years old... the labor rate to refresh is a large % of a new machine (I, and I've seen others at the same amount, charge something like $300+ for that (depending on the number of apps). Or that same $300+ will get the new machine setup, patched, same new apps installed, data and it'll be an even faster machine with a warrantee.
are there glaring holes in my thinnking? What do you do in this situation / what do you recommend clients do? am I off base saying that windows is the problem?
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
Try this:
http://www.speedguide.net/
d_may
What only suggestion comes to my mind is to make an image of partition with windows and all patches
installed. In case of system is going slower and slower, you don't waste time for reinstallation (and activation) of your system, but just 'dump' data back. Before, you need of course to copy any
valuable data somewhere. This approach requires additional space, probably also some sort of software.
If you are lucky linux user, you can just dd partition and compress image. Enough for such purposes.
Otherwise there are many backup-restore software available.
After you have pure system, you just install few (several?) apps and have system refreshed.
I practice this with my home PC and my clients' machines also.
My private observation is, that main problem in M$ OSes is registry. Because OS is not forcing anything,
apps usually put a lot of data into it, but don't remove it while de-installed. As result, you get growing
bunch of data with increasing number of dependencies and links, not necessarily satisfied. That probably
makes the system working so slow.
I have few clients who use only few applications and don't install/uninstall anything themselves. They
have about 2 years old machines (maybe even 3 years...) and they are running like brand new.
BTW if your client doesn't understand that OS is the problem, show them other OS'es.
Sometimes it works. Especially, when you run window manager with lots of bells and whistles, then
run several applications on several virtual screens and all is working fluently on two times slower
machine :)
OK, that's all for now... Wish you much patience for both OS and your clients.
Well, Typically my clients keep computer from 3 to 5 years. The 3 year machines are small compact and purchased with 3 years in mind. the 5 year machine are usually double the cost with double everything else and last usually 6 years.
You are treading on a pond with big waves. on one hand you have maintenance costs of old machines. Something you didn't mention to your clients (or I didn't hear in your question) is RISK. What is the risk of keeping all of the old machines running. most HD's, notably the only piece of moving hardware a computer has comes with only a 1 year MFG warranty and only warranties the drive not the DATA....now what do I do?
I lay out the maintenance costs, and % risks.. make the risks look real bad.. BECAUSE THEY ARE!! LOSS of productivity, DATA, possible contracts. yadda yadda.
Lay out the upgrade paths. There are more then one or two. upgrade in ram, and Hard Drives makes machines at 3ghz pretty nice. But your reinstalling...back to Risks....
Layout a new computer upgrade path, taking into consideration that every machine taken out of service could help UPDATE an older helping it's service life ie RAM swaps...
Bar none, the new computer path is taken, when atleast once one big wig's computer dies with data on it.
State the facts. give them a worse case scenerio.. Accountant HD Motor goes. 5-6g's to have the data recovered. MINIMUM>>> believe me i've done it, and sometimes shock therapy works....
Lastly, Are you off base with windows being the problem.. No, but your teetering... Windows 2000 I believe is just about out of it's lifecycle....
When's the last time your organization ran the same piece of software for over 6 years... minus their accounting or ERP software which still requires updates and upgrades to fix issues...oh and another piece of software to run on? Do we have any other systems to make equivalent measures? Linux? still has base requirements, put linux on an undersized machine and see what it act's like....
Undersized I say, but the miminum requirements are met. they are just that.. minimum requirements. Purchase a ferrari with a 4 cylinder and ask why it doesn't run as fast as the others?? Besides your ferrari needs, Speakers, Ipod's, A bunch of other addon's to make it work just right.. but still the same engine and 250 lbs heavier.... Your not off base, but as software evolves it does require more to keep it at par....
Hope this help's or atleast rasies more questions....
cvv
Another possibility is to run a good cleanup program (not the Windows-supplied disk cleanup). Two good ones are CCleaner (www.ccleaner.com) and Cleanup (http://www.stevengould.or
Cleanup works exceptionally well for pc's that have more than one user's profile on the pc. It's default cleans up all profiles on the pc.
CCleaner's default cleans up the currently logged in user. You can select additional folders to add, so can configure it to clean other users also.
CCleaner also includes a registry cleaner that does a good job of cleaning up broken links in the registry.
Run these tools, then do another defrag.
Also check the startup list (CCleaner also has a tool to list all startup items) and remove anything that is unnecessary.
Obviously, a complete re-image will give you a fresh start, but the cleanup procedures above do a pretty decent job.
As others have said, after three years or so, any Microsoft OS tends to get "crufty", particularly the registry, which can bloat horribly. "Cleaning" can help, but can only go so far. In the long run, however, a total reinstall is a much preferred solution. The only question is whether the cure is worth the time and effort.
What I normally do is to set up a dual-boot that allows them to get to their old OS and data. A fresh install with patches and basic apps can be done in a day or so. Once they play with a "fresh" machine the generally do not want to go back, and within a few months the old OS is abandoned and can be deleted. Imaging is also a sensible option.
As an aside, Kudos to cvvood: "the only piece of moving hardware a computer has comes with only a 1 year MFG warranty and only warranties the drive not the DATA"
On most machines that are over two years old, the data is more valuable than the hard drive. This is why on my main home machine I have dual Seagate Drives (5 year warranty!) in a RAID-1 (mirror) configuration, AND a tape backup for the most important 10% (OS and important data). Yes, I am THAT paranoid... but when a drive failed last year I was able to get a warranty replacement without losing any data at all.
My work machine (development) is imaged monthly and backed up to tape weekly. My clients would not pay for tape backup or UPS (another must if you are serious about your data), so I supplied my own, with their permission. Now, when the power goes out, I sigh, smile and perform an orderly shutdown after ten minutes or so... while co-workers do the headless-chicken dance and complain about lost minutes - or hours - of work.
The sad fact is that most people do not care about data protection until it happens to them, by which time it is too late to do anything about it.
Read this for a tragicomedic treatment of the subject (userfriendly.org): http://tinyurl.com/2bbsj5
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: David-HowardPosted on 2007-04-17 at 16:15:46ID: 18928211
No holes that I can see.
My machines get reimaged for the exact reasons that you listed.
When I worked on the side I ensured that the hardware could handle the OS and any other applications that they may need. I took into consideration if they were gamers, etc.
I copied their data, reinstalled the OS, etc. and rarely had any pc that didn't noticeably increase in response time.
3 years old and at 3Ghz they should be able to run just about an OS.
I have a very reliable and quick XP Pro box at home.
866Mhz and 512K of RAM. It's quick because the OS stays fresh and I don't have everything that you can install from the internet on it. :-)
David