A good question - I would love to have a SCSI based system as it has a few advanatages. I can plug in more drives, upto 15 at last count where as IDE is limited to four (unless you have two controllers which would be eight). I think the throughput is better than IDE to you should be in for a smoother ride with Windows/Linux. IDE is a little stop start. The current SCSI adaptors are real fast - beating the more humble IDE drives, even in UDMA modes
But the thing is the cost is a killer. Not only are you buying an expensive drive, you need the adapter card and the cables/termination too.
Unless you need a server like system with large drive space. Or a system more dedicated to CD duplication the cost of installing the complete SCSI system would not make economic sense.
If you want a SCSI CD Writer this is ok as you can get a (cheap) single device adaptor for it - or even with it in some bundles. Anything that seperates the source data channel from the destination does well for copying performance and reliability. However the dual channel of IDE does this quite well.
I dont think the SCSI/IDE issue really affects the Internet perfromance - its really overall system performance and this can be acheived with either. Get a new fast drive with plenty of space. Put your swap file on it (virtual memory) and you should see a peformance increase. I would suggest 128Mb of RAM as the Internet software creates several processes ( along with the rest of Windows/Linux)and more memory will aid this.
Linux would love a SCSI system and if you are doing more than desktop stuff with it this maybe the way to go. If you are 'playing' with Linux stick with IDE.
In short with what you have told us, I would buy an IDE drive and upgrade to 128MB of RAM. Only if you have money to burn set yourself up with a good 160 SCSI adaptor and hard drive.
Storm :-)
Main Topics
Browse All Topics





by: HDWILKINSPosted on 2000-12-16 at 22:10:25ID: 25830
I would say no. I think you would get more bang for your buck by adding memory. That way you won't be swaping to disk as much.
HW