Thanks Kent, but for some reason the packets just end at 10.1.10.5 when I do a tracert to the internet.
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsOne of my network locations is losing their direct internet connection and I need to keep them up by routing all of their internet traffic to a second location that has internet connectivity. The two networks are connected via T1 lines.
I need to change the line that states:
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.2.6
10.1.2.6 is the firewall on the local end. The two cisco routers are connected via their own network: 10.1.10.5 (remote) and 10.1.10.6 (local) The remote network is 10.1.1.0 and the local network is 10.1.2.0.
I tried to replace the line to read 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.6 (remote firewall) as well as using 10.1.1.1 (remote ip of cisco router) and even 10.1.10.5.... none of those entries worked, though.
What am I missing?
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
Yes, the remote router is routing all 0.0.0.0 traffic to it's firewall, then out to the internet.
router rip
version 2
network 10.0.0.0
!
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.6
ip route 10.1.2.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.10.6
ip route 192.168.22.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.14
ip route 192.168.42.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.14
no ip http server
Sure thing, here's the sh:
Gateway of last resort is 10.1.1.6 to network 0.0.0.0
S 192.168.42.0/24 [1/0] via 10.1.1.14
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 4 subnets, 3 masks
C 10.1.10.4/30 is directly connected, Multilink1
C 10.1.10.6/32 is directly connected, Multilink1
S 10.1.2.0/24 [1/0] via 10.1.10.6
C 10.1.1.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0
S 192.168.22.0/24 [1/0] via 10.1.1.14
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 10.1.1.6
I'll remove RIP, too...
The problem was two-fold. The routes should have been going to the remote network not the remote router network. Also, routes needed to be added to the firewall as that was why they were stopping at the remote router.
Being that I didn't receive any responses after my last post, I would like this question closed.
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: EmpKentPosted on 2009-04-07 at 16:38:11ID: 24092925
Larry,
It sounds like you now want all of your traffic to go through the WAN to the primary site so removing both routes:
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.2.6
ip route 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.10.5
And replacing them with a single one:
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.1.10.5
Should do the trick. You probably do not need RIP enabled on this router.
In that case you could use an ip default gateway command as well.
Kent