Why not get your own network block and use BGP? Then you will have the redundancy of two connections but no need to worry about anything else. They will load balance when both are up and work just fine when 1 is down.
Main Topics
Browse All Topics I would like to know if this is possible with my existing equipment. I will have two different ISP's, each supplying me with a respective public IP address. I will have a Cisco ASA5520 handling both ISP's. The ASA will be attached to a Cisco 3750 running the EMI IOS image. My web server will be attached to the 3750. What I would like to happen is for the web server to be accessible from either of the public IP addresses at any time. For example, let's say www.domain.com resolves to 192.168.1.1 (ISP1) and backup.domain.com resolves to 192.168.2.1 (ISP2). At this point in time the web server is going to send all it's traffic back out the default gateway (192.168.1.1), so if an end user tries to access it via 192.168.2.1 they will get no response. Is there a way to somehow 'tag' the packets maybe using CoS or DSCP and then use Policy Based Routing on the 3750 to send the traffic back out the interface from whence it came? Just need a kick in the right direction here..
http://www.littletreefarms
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
<<On the .1.1 router can you configure a route that forwards any trafic destined to .2.x to the other gateway?>>
If it is a http response from the web server, it's destined to go out the 1.1 because that's the default gateway. I need some way of knowing the request actually come from the 2.1 router.
<<Why not get your own network block and use BGP?>>
Blah, money$$ and plus one of the providers won't support BGP.
Thanks for the suggestions so far ...
For anyone interested, here's a brief description of what I did to 'multihome' an email server without using BGP.
- Configure two private ip addresses (/30) on the Windows server.
- Configure static NAT entries on the gateway router. These
entries translate to one of the two ip addresses (/30) on the
server depending upon which ISP public ip it came in on.
- Used policy routing to source route packets back out the correct
ISP using the source address of the server.
It's not pretty - but it worked in the lab. Will get me by while I work on BGP with the other ISP.
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: nealerocksPosted on 2009-05-01 at 10:23:09ID: 24281510
On the .1.1 router can you configure a route that forwards any trafic destined to .2.x to the other gateway?