OK...I understand that...
However, the problem is not that its not dist. the traffic evenly -- I know that alway going to be the case...
The problem is ...the total traffic throughput is way to low...
i have 3 servers, each with "one" 1-gig line speed links all pushing data at once to the NFS share on the NAS box which has 4 ports that are under LACP connected to the 4-port etherchannel on the cisco.
I am only seeing about 101mbs(1000gbps) -- should'nt I at least be pushing data at 2-3gbps, since the data is coming from 3 seperate servers?
Main Topics
Browse All Topics





by: donjohnstonPosted on 2009-06-02 at 19:08:34ID: 24533022
>Is there something I'm missing?
No.
Many people confuse Etherchannel with load balancing.
Etherchannel will distribute the traffic over ONE of the physical links based on a number of different algorithms. MAC address, IP address, TCP port numbers to name a few.
If you're copying a file from one device to another, It's almost an absolute certainty that all the traffic is crossing a single link.
If you're copying a files from 4 different hosts to one server, there's a good chance that the traffic from two (or more) of the hosts is crossing the same link.
Bottom line is that with etherchannel, the traffic will be distributed across the links. It just won't necessarily be EVENLY distributed.