Why is this question in Wireless Network Cards & Adapters zone?
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsWe have a source mail-in database that is about 1GB on a Lotus Domino server 8.0.2 FP1 running on Windows 2003 Server. The database template is based on the 6.5.4 standard - as are most user's mail files. The database has a replica on another server however its size has grown to 64GB in a matter of 24 hours. I have run a fixup, updall -V, and compact -B and compact -C on the replica and while this has brought the size back in line with the source, the database size just starts growing again (within an hour or 2 after maintenance was run the db was 5GB in size and the source still at 1GB.)
I have also re-created the replica from the source server but the new replica exhibits the same behaviour. The replica is located on a Domino 8.0.2 FP1 HF82 server running Windows 2003 server.
Other mail files, with the same template are replicating normally between the same two servers and do not demonstrate this behaviour.
Any ideas as to what could be causing this growth and how to go about fixing it?
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
If you compare both databases, how many documents etc. are in there?
Check the Log database, Usage, By Size, it contains for all databases the size of the views, updated at 5 AM. If you have the Catalog task running, you can find a lot of info in the catalog.nsf database as well. That database is usually updated during the night as well.
According to the catalog.nsf on both the source and replica server - (updated this morning around 1-2am) here is the following information:
Source Server:
Database size: 1,756,691,456
Number of documents: 1292
Number of design documents: 611
Replica Server:
Database size: 68,327,309,312
Number of documents: 1292
Number of design documents: 615
I cant see anything significantly different in the log database with regard to the various view sizes either.
Obviously the problem is not due to document number or design elements.
Check view indexes:
Open Domino Administrator > Files tab > position cursor on your db and select Manage views from Tools drop-down menu on the right.
There you can see the size of each view in a db.
Compare view sizes of two replicas.
Ok status update - at the moment the mail file replicas seem to be stable and in-line with eachother.
This is what I have done:
1. Stopped the update task on the replica server
2. Performed fixup, updall -R and compact -C on the replica database
3. Restarted the update task on the replica server
Since then (about 2-3 hours ago) both replicas on the source and replica server are about the same size, give or take a few MBs, and contain the same number of documents. Scheduled replication appears to be happening normally as well.
I'm going to leave this until the morning and see if things are still stable before taking any further action.
Yes clustering is involved - the source server is clustered with another server running the same OS and Domino version. The replica database is also clustered with another server running the same version of Domino.
As already stated, other mail files are setup in a similar fashion and dont show this behaviour - so there must be something specific to this database that is causing the issue.
I'm getting very curious... I have the following ideas to continue the investigation:
A. make a Notes copy of the database, and set up replication like the others; if it doesn't have the same behaviour, well, you're there, and it must have been some internal document corruption (prob. 1%)
B. make a new replica somewhere else, on yet another server, disable replication to it in order to prevent changes, (if you can, reroute the new mails to this new replica) and then delete all documents from the original database; then, create a new replica on the 2nd server, and see what happens; if it doesn't grow beyond control, there's a fishy document among the mails in the original database; if it does, it must be the design
C. the same, but leave a few 100 documents or so, because maybe the cancer needs a trigger
D. set up archiving: my running mail database contains mails from the last 3 months, all the rest is in an archive that I need only occasionally; if the database starts replicating normally, the cancer was in an archived document; the archive database need not be clustered, e.g. a server db and a local replica should be enough (if you do backups)
No more ideas for the moment... I suppose this should keep you busy for a few hours ;-))
Before trying the options above I have done the following:
1. Delete the replicas from the replica servers
2. Performed maintenance (again) on the source db
3. Instead of creating the new replcas on the replica servers by using the Notes client (File > Replication > New Replica) I have created the replicas using the admin process in the Domino Admin client
The new replicas were complete at 09:37 this morning and so far (at 14:30) the replica sizes are holding steady, whereas previously they would have ballooned at least 10-fold by now.
Fingers crossed...if this fails, then I'll try suggestions above...
OK so the good news is that the database is holding steady at just over 1GB in line with its source. So looks like the following may have worked to resolve the issue, why I dont know!
1. Delete the replicas from the replica servers
2. Performed maintenance (again) on the source db
3. Instead of creating the new replcas on the replica servers by using the Notes client (File > Replication > New Replica) I have created the replicas using the admin process in the Domino Admin client
The new replicas were complete at 09:37 this morning and so far (at 14:30) the replica sizes are holding steady, whereas previously they would have ballooned at least 10-fold by now.
Thanks to all for their input
Check whether someone scheduled a program in names.nsf.
E.g. this program document would produce the similar effect that you have:
names.nsf > Configurations > Servers > Programs
Program name:
updall
Command line:
"SubfolderOfData\Productio
Server to run on:
The name of your "faulty" server
-C option means that Update (indexer) task will update indexes of all unused views.
That means that all other view indexes are built because they are used, which again means that all db views are going to be built at all times, so the users will never have to wait for any view to be built.
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: mbonaciPosted on 2009-11-04 at 04:04:45ID: 25738461
Compare server tasks with one of those two servers that are working as expected.
Try stopping the Indexer task and check the situation then.