One can configure either one to outperform the other, even if disks are all same make/model. A rule of thumb would say that a 3disk RAID 5 would be expected to be faster on reads, but that is not always the case, especially if the RAID10 was configured with too large of a stripe size.
If you are just looking for a good generic rule for SQL, then you are better off with 2 x RAID1 then a single RAID10, especially if there are no other disks for the computer to boot from.
Main Topics
Browse All Topics





by: rrjegan17Posted on 2009-11-03 at 21:52:54ID: 25736742
Go for RAID 10 to have faster Reads and Writes
ips/raid5- vs-raid-10 -safety- pe rformance. html AARF/RAID5 _versus_RA ID10.txt /billg/arc hive/2007/ 06/18/RAID -10- vs.-RA ID-5-Perfo rmance.asp x
http://www.cyberciti.biz/t
http://www.miracleas.com/B
http://weblogs.sqlteam.com
For safety and performance favor RAID10 first, RAID3 second,
RAID4 third, and RAID5 last