Advertisement

08.24.2008 at 10:38AM PDT, ID: 23673847
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

9.3

Architectural design for virtualization and system layouts and uses

Asked by manelson05 in Windows Server 2008, Microsoft Virtual Server, Hypervisor

Tags: , , ,

I have the opportunity to get 2 HP Dl360 sevrs with dual quad core 2.4Ghz procs and 8Gb ram. Th ebase hdd layout is (2) 72Gb ( OS in raid 1+0) and (4 146 Raid 5 w/ spare). I have the option to change the disc layouts I as told as well.

My question on virtualisation as I am new to this is the following.

Would one machine be setup as the physical with OS and memory then each additional machine be configured with virtual procs, mem and HDD, if so would raid 1+0 or raid 1 be best for speed and efficiency? Would Visor or Vmware be easiset to manage and configure?

MY thoughts are as following, one Dl360 running a virtual machine 1 with SQL and Dynamics with 4-6 GB ram on raid 1+0 and Virtual machine 2 running exchange 2007 with raid 1+0 or a raid 5 setup and 2-4 Gb memory. The second DL360 would be a mirror of machine one using MS 2008 load balancing for redundancy.

Am I on the right track is this feasible? I am trying to build up a stable and reliable system for our comapnies ling term IT needs.
I have a new ML350 runing Wins, DNS, DHCP and DC roles along wiht it hosting a 3Tb File server.

I would appreciate any fedback good or bad as I am learning all I can withing a pressure cooker.


Thank you

markStart Free Trial
[+][-]09.01.2008 at 02:52AM PDT, ID: 22358750

View this solution now by starting your 7-day free trial. Setting up your free trial is quick, easy, and secure. We will return you to this solution, unlocked, when you're done.

 

About this solution

Zones: Windows Server 2008, Microsoft Virtual Server, Hypervisor
Tags: MIcrosoft, Server 2008, R1, Wanting to Run SQL 2005w/ upgraded Dynamics 9.0 and Exchange 2007 upgraded from Exchange 2003
Sign Up Now!
Solution Provided By: schmiegu
Participating Experts: 1
Solution Grade: A
 
 
 
Loading Advertisement...
20081112-EE-VQP-42 / EE_QW_2_20070628