"In SqL Server 2005 the "problem" is solved as they come with partitionned table (like oracle has already since years), where you can put each partition into it's own filegroup."
You can do that now with check constraints and partitioned views--2005 just makes it easier and implements it a tad different.
Other than that, I would agree with angelIII UNLESS by merging the table together the data becomes less unique and none of your indexes perform as they did before.
Brett
Main Topics
Browse All Topics





by: angelIIIPosted on 2005-09-29 at 07:44:20ID: 14984214
>i have 5 identical Action tables with exact columns except the with different data type for Action codes and stuff like that..
>I am thinking about merging these all 5 tables into one and adding an extra field to say Type.
Yes, this is a good idea in general.
However, if the tables are really large, then keeping them apart can help performance because of I/O issues.
In SqL Server 2005 the "problem" is solved as they come with partitionned table (like oracle has already since years), where you can put each partition into it's own filegroup.