ASIADMIN
asked on
SQL search three table columns for three variable
I have a situation where I have three table columns, we will call them Part1, Part2, and Part3.
A user will input three part numbers into a program and I will need to search for that combination of part numbers but the part numbers could be in any order and exist in any one of those columns listed above. all three of the parts entered by the user must exist in the three DB columns to be true and they can not be repeated unless the user enters the same part number twice. Is there any way to perform a search for this in SQL?
I understand this may be kind of vague so please ask questions if you have any.
A user will input three part numbers into a program and I will need to search for that combination of part numbers but the part numbers could be in any order and exist in any one of those columns listed above. all three of the parts entered by the user must exist in the three DB columns to be true and they can not be repeated unless the user enters the same part number twice. Is there any way to perform a search for this in SQL?
I understand this may be kind of vague so please ask questions if you have any.
ASKER
this would normally work but the values can not be repeated. for example:
table1
value1 value2 value3
x y z
x x x
y y z
z y x
y x x
users enters x, y, z respectively
I only want it to return
value1 value2 value3
x y z
z y x
in the code you suggested it would return all the rows.
if I'm looking at your code incorrectly please let me know.
table1
value1 value2 value3
x y z
x x x
y y z
z y x
y x x
users enters x, y, z respectively
I only want it to return
value1 value2 value3
x y z
z y x
in the code you suggested it would return all the rows.
if I'm looking at your code incorrectly please let me know.
try adding:
Where
...
AND ( (Part1 in (UserEnteredValue1,UserEnteredValue2,UserEnteredValue3)
AND (Part2 in (UserEnteredValue1,UserEnteredValue2,UserEnteredValue3)
AND (Part3 in (UserEnteredValue1,UserEnteredValue2,UserEnteredValue3)
)
and part1 <> part2
and part1 <> part3
and part2 <> part3
ASKER
it is possible for the user to enter x, x, y
I see what you are saying. Actually it should be the other way around:
Where ...
AND
( UserEnteredValue1 in (Part1,Part2, Part3)
AND UserEnteredValue2 in (Part1,Part2, Part3)
AND UserEnteredValue3 in (Part1,Part2, Part3)
)
CODE-Madness, try this one...!!! please send feedback...
with urTable (A, B, C) as (
-- YOUR TABLE
SELECT 'A', 'A', 'B'
UNION ALL
SELECT 'B', 'A', 'B'
UNION ALL
SELECT 'A', 'C', 'B'
UNION ALL
SELECT 'C', 'A', 'B'
UNION ALL
SELECT 'A', 'B', 'B'
UNION ALL
SELECT 'B', 'B', 'B'
UNION ALL
SELECT 'B', 'C', 'B'
UNION ALL
SELECT 'B', 'B', 'B'
UNION ALL
SELECT 'B', 'B', 'B'
), SearchParts (A, B, C) as (
-- USER ENTER
SELECT 'B', 'B', 'C'
)
select T.A, T.B, T.C,
-- this just to show which values are compared -BEGIN
checksum(T.A, T.B, T.C) as T1,
checksum(P.A, P.B, P.C) as P1,
checksum(P.A, P.C, P.B) as P2,
checksum(P.B, P.A, P.C) as P3,
checksum(P.B, P.C, P.A) as P4,
checksum(P.C, P.A, P.B) as P5,
checksum(P.C, P.B, P.A) as P6
-- this just to show which values are compared -END
from urTable T inner join SearchParts P
on (
checksum(T.A, T.B, T.C) In (
checksum(P.A, P.B, P.C),
checksum(P.A, P.C, P.B),
checksum(P.B, P.A, P.C),
checksum(P.B, P.C, P.A),
checksum(P.C, P.A, P.B),
checksum(P.C, P.B, P.A)
)
)
Regards
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Thank you! It was an interesting question too. Cheers, Paul.
hey Paul, if a make changes in sql Fiddle, do you see them?
Be glad you got the points...
Be glad you got the points...
sure do,
I actually just had a look at yours (I tweaked it as more comparable)
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!3/ffb08/8
It's an interesting approach you took
I actually just had a look at yours (I tweaked it as more comparable)
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!3/ffb08/8
It's an interesting approach you took
https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/28155538/SQL-search-three-table-columns-for-three-variable.html?anchorAnswerId=39242552#a39242552
look closer the input data and the output data
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!3/cae45/2
by: ASIADMINPosted on 2013-06-12 at 22:22:02ID: 39242552
it is possible for the user to enter x, x, y
look closer the input data and the output data
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!3/cae45/2
I see, you are right, the impact of sequence is better addressed by your method
@ASIADMIN
by extending the possible data variations BAKADY had identified flaws in my approach
You may want to look at http://sqlfiddle.com/#!3/cae45/2
He has also simplified his code, so please do re-consider.
@BAKADY
whilst sqlfiddle is cool - we prefer that the code gets included here - I'd suggest you post that latest iteration. (btw: by making the code simpler there is a better chance of it being understood - I did briefly look at yours today - but got confused by all those single chars ;)
Nice job.
@ASIADMIN
by extending the possible data variations BAKADY had identified flaws in my approach
You may want to look at http://sqlfiddle.com/#!3/cae45/2
He has also simplified his code, so please do re-consider.
@BAKADY
whilst sqlfiddle is cool - we prefer that the code gets included here - I'd suggest you post that latest iteration. (btw: by making the code simpler there is a better chance of it being understood - I did briefly look at yours today - but got confused by all those single chars ;)
Nice job.
('y', 'x', 'x') <= twice x, once y
('x', 'y', 'x'), <= twice x, once y
('y', 'y', 'x'), <= once x, twice y
('x', 'y', 'y') <= once x, twice y
set @UserEnteredValue1 = 'x'
set @UserEnteredValue2 = 'x'
set @UserEnteredValue3 = 'y'
it mean user is looking for all matches with twice x and once y...or am i wrong???
ASKER
no you are right that is exactly what im looking for
let me take some time and rethink this and get back to you.
thanks for all your help guys
let me take some time and rethink this and get back to you.
thanks for all your help guys
ASKER
Bakady
your solution seems to be correct, and I do see the flaw in pauls code now.
I guess there isn't anyway for me to split the points between the two of you is there
your solution seems to be correct, and I do see the flaw in pauls code now.
I guess there isn't anyway for me to split the points between the two of you is there
hit request attention up at the top and ask a mod to re-open the question so you can close with the point split. i've thoroughly enjoyed seeing these solutions =)
BEFORE the solution can be re-awarded, the new solution code should be posted
@BAKADY
whilst sqlfiddle is cool - we prefer that the code gets included here - I'd suggest you post that latest iteration.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
Thanks again for all your help guys
Open in new window