Advertisement

02.08.2008 at 01:18AM PST, ID: 23147210
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

8.6

Downsides of Implementing Table Partitions

Asked by nickrawlins in SQL Server 2005

Tags: , ,

Hi,

I'm looking at implementing table partitions in our database on SQL 2005.

We've testing it on a couple of tables containing over half a million records and we've noticed a performance increase of around half the speed of a normal query prior to the partitioning.

Is anyone aware of any negetive reasons as to why implementing partitioning maybe a bad idea?

I'm looking for any performance decrease etc.. when modifying the table structure, or any maintenance that needs to be carried out on these partitions etc...

I'm not sure if partitiong in SQL 2005 physically does something to the tables or is it just a type of view SQL server has so the pointer is only looking at certain records.

This is partitioning in SQL 2005 where i've created the partition function and partition scheme etc.. not the pre-2005 model, (i.e physically partitioning a table and using views to look at these records)


Many Thanks,

NickStart Free Trial
[+][-]02.08.2008 at 01:33AM PST, ID: 20848837

View this solution now by starting your 7-day free trial. Setting up your free trial is quick, easy, and secure. We will return you to this solution, unlocked, when you're done.

 

About this solution

Zone: SQL Server 2005
Tags: microsoft, sql, 2005
Sign Up Now!
Solution Provided By: angelIII
Participating Experts: 2
Solution Grade: B
 
 
[+][-]02.08.2008 at 01:41AM PST, ID: 20848861

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]02.08.2008 at 01:49AM PST, ID: 20848885

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]02.08.2008 at 04:19AM PST, ID: 20849473

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
 
Loading Advertisement...
20080716-EE-VQP-32 / EE_QW_2_20070628