Advertisement

05.30.2008 at 03:03AM PDT, ID: 23444069
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

7.3

Advice needed on setting up Primary Key Clustered Index for an old database to be transfered

Asked by gcz in SQL Server 2005, Databases Miscellaneous, SQL Query Syntax

Tags: , , ,

Hi Experts

We are in the process of transferring an old database to MS SQL.  

The address table has a non-sequential but unique Id of 3 alphas followed by 3 numbers (i.e. Microsoft would be MIC001 etc.) which we call NADNR.  And it also has a sequential serial number.  

Clearly this table is the one most accessed and important tables referenced by very many of the other tables in the database, so good performance is key.
 
My question what is the best way to set up the Primary Key Clustered Index, without the database taking a hit on speed of access? Our old database does not have the concept of a Clustered index.

On the old database we used the NADNR most because it was easiest for users to relate to, but if we make this the PK Clustered then can we expect this table to become much less efficient than if we use the serial number instead (because of the number of inserts)?

Currently there are some 19,000 records with about 5-10 added records being inserted each working day. There are some 50-75 users that access this read/write table continuously.

Look forward to hearing from you.
Start Free Trial
[+][-]05.30.2008 at 03:16AM PDT, ID: 21676449

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]05.30.2008 at 03:28AM PDT, ID: 21676496

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]05.30.2008 at 03:46AM PDT, ID: 21676556

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]05.30.2008 at 07:27AM PDT, ID: 21678026

View this solution now by starting your 7-day free trial. Setting up your free trial is quick, easy, and secure. We will return you to this solution, unlocked, when you're done.

 

About this solution

Zones: SQL Server 2005, Databases Miscellaneous, SQL Query Syntax
Tags: Microsoft, SQL, Server 2005, Database transfer
Sign Up Now!
Solution Provided By: mark_wills
Participating Experts: 2
Solution Grade: B
 
 
 
Loading Advertisement...
20080716-EE-VQP-32 / EE_QW_2_20070628