|
[x]
Posted via EE Mobile
|
|
| Search, ask, and monitor your questions on the go with EE Mobile. Visit Experts Exchange from your mobile device and never be out of touch again. |
|
|
|
|
|
[x]
The Solution Rating System
|
|
| With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating. - The Grade of the Solution
- The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
- The Number of Author and Expert Comments
- The Number of Experts Contributing
- The Feedback of the Community
Your Input Matters Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site. If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support. Thank you! |
|
|
|
|
Asked by ZekeLA in MS SQL Server, Microsoft Hardware, Microsoft Server
We currently use SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition for our primarily B2B web site. We are looking at upgrading to SQL 2005 or 2008 but I'm confused as to which editions / licensing we can / should use.
It looks like for SQL 2005, we would stay with the Standard Edition. Could we use the Workgroup edition instead?
For SQL 2008, the web version seems hugely less expensive than the Standard Edition. For example, it would only be $15 x 2 CPU x 60 months (for an expected life time of 5 years) or $1,800 total. That's less than the Standard would cost of $6000 x 2 CPU = $12,000. Am I missing something or is the web version the way to go?
Lastly, for web applications, how do you determine the number of CALs required if we don't go with server or processor licensing?
Thank you.
20091111-EE-VQP-92 - Hierarchy / EE_QW_3_20080625