Your answer placed me in the proper mind set to discover my own problem.
Our problem was that we were trying to include that 127 ip which didn't need to be involved.
In radius I changed the profile to the information for the subnet I wanted, I assigned .9 to the router and connected and things looked better.
Then in my [Router A] I changed the route from:
In [Router A] a route of xx.51.155.8 255.255.255.248 xx.51.154.127 <-- send subnet to this ip
to:
In [Router A] a route of xx.51.155.8 255.255.255.248 [Router B primary IP] <-- send subnet to this ip
On [Router B] once the DSL router established connection it showed the proper routing table like I expected.
Thanks greatly for your assistance!
Main Topics
Browse All Topics





by: meverestPosted on 2005-02-14 at 14:33:50ID: 13309071
Hi,
your logic appears good, apparently the 'router B' does not know that he has a local network of xx.51.155.8/29 and is forwarding back to the default route - check the routing table on that device to make sure that the LAN adressing is correct.
paste the results here if you like.
cheers.