This will scan for the latest viruses:
http://vil.nai.com/vil/sti
Read Instructions
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsHi Everyone:
I am trying to help a friend of mine who connects to cable modem through a wireless base station or router who is experiencing very slow internet performance. In fact, the loading of web pages and downloading of files is almost equivalent to the old 56K connection.
Is there anything he can do to increase his internet performance?
Thank you.
George
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
This will scan for the latest viruses:
http://vil.nai.com/vil/sti
Read Instructions
Hi Everyone;
We have run Spybot and Mcafee Anti-Virus programs. Even though there were not any viruses detected, there was spyware detected and cleaned from the system. Unfortunately, the internet is still sluggish with 56K equivalent downloads despite of the computer having cable connection through the wireless router. This situation has been going on now for about 3 weeks. Is there a way of "restoring" the system back to a time frame when the internet had peek performance? For instance, I noticed within Windows XP at Menu Select Bootup, there was an option to Restore Windows Back To An Original State or something along those lines.
Any more suggestions will certainly be appreciated.
Thank you
George
One thing to test, try pinging a website that you KNOW has ping enabled to see if you are getting any packet loss.
for example, "ping www.whateverdomain.com"
See what the packet loss, if any is. If there is, it may be either your connection to your LAN or the internet. Then ping the router, see if you get packet loss... the router should have an IP address similar to: 192.168.0.1 or something like that, depending on what router brand you have. This is just the beginning of a long method to narrow down the problem.
Let us know the outcome.
go here, it has loads of optimisation tips:
http://speedguide.net
Hope that helps,
Liam
Hi Everyone:
I thought I would take a moment and provide a followup of the status of the sluggish internet performance. I got the IP address of the router and pinged to it. After reviewing the summary of the ping, there was not any data packets lost. However, when I looked at the information provided by Microsoft Broadband Utility Software, it did indicate a data packet loss. With these two different things contradicting one another, I am not sure which of the two to go by. Should the data packets sent always equal the data packets received? Just curious on that part.
Now, I have not pinged to a website on the internet because I do not know the IP address of any websites which allows pinging. Could someone provide an IP address of a reliable site which can be pinged?
If I get lost data packets from pinging the internet and not the router, what exactly would that indicate?
A problem with the internet connection and not the router?
In conclusion, I am interested in reading more feedback on this post. As everyone can tell, I still have many sub-questions to this post.
Thanks again to everyone for providing feedback. I certainly welcome more comments.
George
Try pinging 198.6.1.2
Ping using increasingly larger packet size.
If using a PC, use the minus L flag. Basic ping is only 32 bytes. Increase the size and note if the time increases. You can see here that it does increase some (but I'm behind a huge T3 connection) - from 35 ms average to 50ms average:
C:\>ping -l 64 198.6.1.2
Pinging 198.6.1.2 with 64 bytes of data:
Reply from 198.6.1.2: bytes=64 time=31ms TTL=243
Reply from 198.6.1.2: bytes=64 time=31ms TTL=243
Reply from 198.6.1.2: bytes=64 time=31ms TTL=243
Reply from 198.6.1.2: bytes=64 time=47ms TTL=243
Ping statistics for 198.6.1.2:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 31ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 35ms
C:\>ping -l 1000 198.6.1.2
Pinging 198.6.1.2 with 1000 bytes of data:
Reply from 198.6.1.2: bytes=1000 time=47ms TTL=243
Reply from 198.6.1.2: bytes=1000 time=32ms TTL=243
Reply from 198.6.1.2: bytes=1000 time=31ms TTL=243
Reply from 198.6.1.2: bytes=1000 time=47ms TTL=243
Ping statistics for 198.6.1.2:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 31ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 39ms
C:\>ping -l 1500 198.6.1.2
Pinging 198.6.1.2 with 1500 bytes of data:
Reply from 198.6.1.2: bytes=1500 time=46ms TTL=243
Reply from 198.6.1.2: bytes=1500 time=46ms TTL=243
Reply from 198.6.1.2: bytes=1500 time=62ms TTL=243
Reply from 198.6.1.2: bytes=1500 time=46ms TTL=243
Ping statistics for 198.6.1.2:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 46ms, Maximum = 62ms, Average = 50ms
You can also use the "do not fragment" flag to see if it breaks anywhere. You can see here that it breaks down between 1450 and 1500 bytes..
C:\>ping -l 1500 198.6.1.2 -f
Pinging 198.6.1.2 with 1500 bytes of data:
Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set.
Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set.
Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set.
Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set.
Ping statistics for 198.6.1.2:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
C:\>ping -l 1450 198.6.1.2 -f
Pinging 198.6.1.2 with 1450 bytes of data:
Reply from 198.6.1.2: bytes=1450 time=47ms TTL=243
Reply from 198.6.1.2: bytes=1450 time=31ms TTL=243
Reply from 198.6.1.2: bytes=1450 time=32ms TTL=243
Reply from 198.6.1.2: bytes=1450 time=31ms TTL=243
Ping statistics for 198.6.1.2:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 31ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 35ms
Ping www.bbc.co.uk
This site allows pings.
You might want to play around with some of the registry values such as the MTU and similar values as they might be restricting the rate of your download, take a look at:
http://www.speedguide.net
for more information.
Liam
What OS is this ?
If XP then
HOW TO: Restore the Operating System to a Previous State in Windows XP
http://support.microsoft.c
Also, I would install a firewall ( free from zonelabs.com ) to see if there is anything unusual running on the network, and also get the latest drivers.
Does this happen when he is both Wireless or wired ?
Have you tried to get the newest drivers for everything ?
How about disabling the wireless connection as a test.
I hope this helps !
Websites are provided IP addresses by the hosting provider, something out of your control, unless you run your own server and host your own site.
As for the issue of finding out the IP address.... just open a command window and type: nslookup www.domain.com and you'll get the IP address reported to the domain. Or do a whois search at www.samspade.org, where you have plenty of other tools as well.
In TCP/IP properties of Local Area Connection.
Look for dns tab, and what servers are there. If any, remove them and add 198.6.1.3
Or, does he get IP address via DHCP? whatever is giving him the DHCP address could be handing the wrong DNS server IP.
Try setting it regardless, to 198.6.1.3 well-known UUNET cache nameserver always available
If he is not experiencing a problem when "wired" then I would try changing channels on the base station/ router. There could be some form of interference on the channel it is currently set to.
If the problem persists when wired then its possible someone else is "piggybacking" off the wireless network and sucking up all the bandwidth. To stop this require MAC authentication in your IP table for your respective wireless device. Also change it from an open wireless system to a closed wireless system. This will disable the broadcast of the SSID but unfortunately not the BSSID. A change to the SSID would not hurt either.
Hi Everyone:
I greatly appreciate everyone's feedback. Basically, I fixed the slow, sluggish internet performance (slow loading of pages and slow download speeds) by deleting the extra entries within My Network Places. There were two extra computer names which did not belong there and apparently offsetting the bandwidth. It is almost like these extra computer names once existed, but, the user forgot to go back and delete them when assigning new computer names.
With regards to the appropriate reward of points, I will let everyone review their responses and compare it to the mechanics of how I fixed the problem.
I prefer to handle this situation this way as an act of fairness. Personally, I prefer to split the points to all of you who responded to this post. In any case, I would like for everyone to let me know what they are comfortable with regarding this matter.
Thank you.
George
Check this link , it worked for me.
http://download.com.com/30
Hi Everyone:
The problem is fixed. Basically, there were some extra computer names within Network Neighborhood which were unnecessary and apparently sucking up bandwidth. Once I deleted the extra, unnecessary computer names, the internet performance became outstanding once again with respect to loading of pages and downloads. I confirmed my fast internet performace at this great site
http://us.mcafee.com/root/
Thanks again everyone for the wonderful and prompt feedback.
George
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: lrmoorePosted on 2003-09-06 at 16:22:47ID: 9303199
Check for viruses, spyware and adware... /articles/ bho/ spyware.ht ml cts/storie s/reviews/ 0,4161,261 2053,00.ht ml
ews.php?la ng=en
.net/spywa reblaster. html
nhunter.js p
u/
What is Spyware?
http://www.spywareinfo.com
http://www.spychecker.com/
http://www.zdnet.com/produ
Spybot Search and Destroy:
http://security.kolla.de/n
Adaware:
http://www.lavasoftusa.com
Spycop:
http://www.spycop.com/
Spyware Blaster
http://www.wilderssecurity
Trojan Hunter
http://www.misec.net/troja
TDS-3
http://tds.diamondcs.com.a