LOL.. can you make a diagram of how it would be set up and what Ip's to assign what router?
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsIs it possible to get 2 Microsoft( or any) wireless 4 port routers to work off of one internet connection, have two separate SSID's and not have network chaos?
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
I'm not sure of what you pretend, have you tried work with bridge's 3 or more Wireless network cards ?, you have to concentrate all the trafic in one computer that acts as a gateway to your network. One network card for each router, bridge and so one, tried the link below.
http://www.microsoft.com/w
Regards
António Rodrigues
If you are using one internet connection, with one IP address (I assume DSL or cable), you will need to designate one of the wireless routers as the "gateway" to the internet. The other router would be connected in to one of the four ports on the "gateway" router and would only supply IP connectivity; the "gateway" router would provide DHCP and NAT for the rest of the network. Of course you would need to disable DHCP and NAT on the second wireless router. The remaining ports on either of the 2 wileless routers could be used for local LAN connections.
<dsl>----- WAN Port --< MS Wireless "Gateway" (dhcp, PPPoE, NAT)>
four LAN ports
| | | | < 2ND MS Wirless Gateway>
| | | | | | | |
+---------------+
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 ...........
You could add as many gateways as you want by connecting them through the LAN ports.
Don't forget, you must use a cross-over cable to connect the two gateway's together, as I don't think the MS gateways have an "Uplink" switch !!!!
this might help. This is what I have setup and no ne has been able to explain how to get it to work:
Cable
|
MN-500 Microsoft 4 port /wireless b(192.168.1.1) Assigning DH CP
(SSID-Home) WEP enabled
| |
4 wired PC's Microsoft Broadband router(802.11b) setup as bridge(192.168.1.10)
(below the scope of DHCP)
NO DHCP Wep Enabled
(SSID-NEWYORK)
| |
2 wireless PC's Sipura 3000(broadband phone)
I Know I can buy an access point in place of the second router and everyting would work okay but I want to make this setup work. When I had this setup whenever I was wireless or wired under the NEWYORK router, the network would freeze up and everyone wouls lose internet
Hi,
Have you tried statically assigning IP addresses? What you would need to do is give each PC a unique ip address, i.e. 192.168.1.2, 192.168.1.3 etc.. in the TCP/IP properties of the network connection and make sure that for ALL computers the gateway is set to the IP address of the first router (i.e. SSID Home) and that the DNS server is also set to the IP address of the "Home" router.
Also, once you have done this, turn off DHCP on the router (home).
Khilan
okay this is what I have setup which is working so far
Cable
|
MN-500 Microsoft 4 port /wireless b(192.168.1.1) Assigning DH CP
(SSID-Home) WEP enabled
| | |
3 wired PC's (broadband phone) 4 port switch
|
Microsoft Broadband router(802.11b) (192.168.1.60) Underthe scope of HOME
With a DMZ host to that address to bypass the firewall(i have a firewall on this router)
SSID-MSHOME(WEP encrypted)
Assigning DHCP
With Ports open for remote desktop and Pc anywhere
| |
1 wireless PC's Desktop (static ip) 192.168.2.50
when pcagic2004 say that he have two ssid, why he need separate ssid, because downstairs don´t talk with upstairs ? but won´t internet ? one old computer with proxy to delivery Internet, and one ssid and a firewall to contain traffic, with firewall activated, the computers act as single, i don´t see where is the problem, anyway with a firewall and the 2 routers both static address he can do a securely network, the gateway to Internet is the static address that is connect to the wan port 192.168.1.1.
Or meantime have you read the article ?
Since 2000 i haven´t answer to any question, but surprise, here is one of them
One thing you have to do ...
First See examples
http://www.wlana.com/resou
Second see products ...
http://www.wlana.com/about
But meanwhile here a brief history
Most wireless LAN products have the ability, as an authentication management function, to specifically authorize or exclude individual wireless stations. Thus an individual wireless user can be included in a network, or, at any time, locked out. Users may also need to know a wide variety of information, including radio domains, channels (specific frequencies or hopping patterns), subchannels, security IDs, and passwords. Other configuration information relating to in-building roaming might also need to be known. Thus network administrators can make unauthorized network access very, very difficult even for hackers who possess the specific wireless equipment being used at a given site.
More than 15 years of experience and at least, 4 years talking about wireless networks. backing again to business ... :))))))
Sci,
The router is upstairs on thge other side of the house and even though I know they were designed for that distance, it doesn't work because I barely get a signal. Thats why I needed another router.
To all,
To make this all simple, I will be getting a Wireless Access point because none of the above configs are actually working. So all in all I think Sci was right.... It can be done, but not without problems...question answered
Yes it´s true, for me it´s a surprise, this link's i have used in one answer asked in expert-exchange. what they say about the link
For Arodrigues:
Thank you for your reference, I believe it will be very useful.
http://www.experts-exchang
time the link exist, i t's from wirelless Association now in
www.wlana.org/
replaces the link's above
My apologizes,
ARodrigues
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: scraig84Posted on 2004-05-27 at 07:15:36ID: 11171807
Sure.