Hi pseudocyber,
You are correct. I am getting two FC from my ISP, they are each 1G. I know it’s a lot, but that’s what we use :o)
Also, we are getting two networks from them, a class B and C networks. No PIX sorry. I was thinking of creating a single FC port from the two incoming ports, redundant and all, configure the two networks, and then create ACLs, which will be the first line of defense.
Right now our ISP/datacenter does the routing for us. We want to take this task from them using the 3560 which has basic routing capabilities.
Why do u think I shouldn’t use EtherChannel on the two incoming FC? I am basically trying to create one super connection from the two, like a 2 G connection, or take the load from one and use the second as a balancer.
Cheers,
WT.
Main Topics
Browse All Topics





by: pseudocyberPosted on 2005-07-25 at 02:15:26ID: 14516703
So, you're getting fiber from your ISP and you're pluggig it straight into a 3560 in you Data Center. You're getting a Class B network AND a Class C network from your ISP?!? What exactly are you getting from your ISP - are you sure you're gitting 2 GigE connections? That's A LOT of Bandwidth from an ISP ...
You really should get a seperate firewall - like a PIX. Your Internet connection should feed through your firewall - actually it could go into a switch/router before your firewall where you could do some basic screening and then into your firewall for more advanced rules.
Then, I could see an Etherchannel from your firewall(s) to your core network.
The way you describe it now, I don't really see the benefit of doing Etherchannel - you have to do it on BOTH sides of the connection - it just takes two or more connections and "bonds" them together to appear to be one. So, it would be applicable to your other Cisco switch - but you only mention one connection over to it. However it's not really applicable to an ISP.