I have static routes configured, and now I want to implement OSPF Routing over the LES Circuits. The LES Circuit have been recently installed, and I now need to route traffic over the circuits
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsI have a Checkpoint Firewall and I need to configure OSPF Routing to L3 Cisco Switches in another site which are connected by 2 LES Circuits by 2 differnet provider, the 2nd circuit is resilency only. If one circuit fails the traffic will route via the 2nd circuit.
Cisco L3 Switch is configured to use routed ports on the LES (Circuit Primary) 10.15.10.10 and 10.15.10.11 (Seconday Les Circuit)
Currently there are static routes configured on the Checkpoint firewall to the next hop addresses of the Cisco Switches of 10.15.10.10 (primary LES)
CP static Routes 10.15.1.0/24 next hop 10.15.10.10
10.15.1.2/24 next hop 10.15.10.10
10.15.1.6/24 next hop 10.15.10.10
I have OSPF working between the 2 sites, by using interfaces that are directly connected to the Checkpoint.
Checkpoint Interfaces 10.15.10.100 (Primary Les Circuit)
10.15.11.100 (Secondary Les Circuit)
Switch configuration
network 10.15.10.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
network 10.15.11.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
Any idea on how to implement ths solution. do I need to redistruute static into OSPF and increase the priorty on the static higher than 110 ?
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
I have OSPF configured on both Firewall and Switches and have formed neighbour relationships.
I need to able to advertise the static routes on the firewall to the switches, If I do not need static routes how will be able to advertise the routes in OSPF as these networks are not directly connected on the firewall.
i.e. Firewall Static Route 10.15.1.0/24 10.15.10.10 (Switch nest hop)
The 10.15.1.0 network is located of the Cisco switch, On the firewall I am able to advertise directly connected networks.
I have formed adjacency between 1 layer 3 switch and the firewall. The routes I want to redistribute are hanging off the layer 3 switches.
Currently on the firewall they are configured as static routes and I want to provide resilency for the les circuit.
Don,
this is might be a mis-configurtion on my behalf, although I was under the impression that you could only advertise directly connected network or static routes within ospf
Don,
L3 SW --------------------------
The Firewall and the switch are on 2 differenet sites seprated by the LES Circuit, I want to advertise the route from the firewall not switch, I want the LES Circuit to failover if either les circuit is unavailable.
THe network statement can explain what do I need to advertise
>The Firewall and the switch are on 2 differenet sites seprated by the LES Circuit,
Doesn't matter.
>I want to advertise the route from the firewall not switch,
Right. But why have the FW advertise a static route? It's so much easier to let the FW learn the route through OSPF.
>I want the LES Circuit to failover if either les circuit is unavailable.
And it will... If you let the FW learn about the router through OSPF. Otherwise you have to implement SLA.
I have advertised connected networks via the switch by using the following commands.
The routes are not being advertised on the firewall, the only networks that it see are the LES link of 10.15.10.0 and 10.15.11.0
Router ospf 1
net 10.15.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
net 10.15.5.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
net 10.15.6.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
It's the 10.15.1.0/24 network that you want the switches to advertise to the FW, right?
If so, you'll need a network statement on the switches.
network 10.15.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
And you've got a static route on the FW for the 10.15.1.0 network. Static routes are preferred by default. If you want to see the OSPF route, you'll need to either delete the static route or raise it's administrative distance (AD) to be greater than the OSPF AD on the FW.
Don,
I have about 10 networks I wnat the switch to advertise and yes 10.15.1.0/24 is one of the net. I had added the static route back in to the firewall as once I removed the route, the packets were dropped.
The networks I advertised are below
net 10.15.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
net 10.15.5.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
net 10.15.6.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
http://www.techsneeze.com/
It maybe a compatibility problem
try the following on the cisco switch
router ospf 1
no capability lls
Nokia is a Checkpoint appliance
http://www.checkpoint.com/
You can also try some debugging on the voyager.
In Voyager, go to Configuration > Routing > Routing Options. Under OSPF drop-down list, select All and click on Apply. This will generate ipsrd.log.* files under /var/log. Collect the logs during the time when OSPF errors are occuring. There might be multiple files created.
The OSPF LSA from the L3 switch is being received by the Nokia. I'm wondering if there is a bug in the Nokia.
As an alternative to running OSPF:
If you install another Cisco switch next to the Nokia. You could use Etherchannel to combine the two LES circuits together and continue using static routes on the Nokia. The Etherchannel will load balance traffic over both of the LES circuits and continue to work if one of LES circuits fails.
Give the debugging a shot.
In Voyager, go to Configuration > Routing > Routing Options. Under OSPF drop-down list, select All and click on Apply. This will generate ipsrd.log.* files under /var/log. Collect the logs during the time when OSPF errors are occuring. There might be multiple files created.
Then clear the adjacencies from the Cisco end.
yes please remove the
ip ospf network point-to-point
from both of the ports going to the LES links
shut down one of the ports going to LES links so that you only have one OSPF adjacency formed between the Nokia and the Cisco
Then start another OSPF debug on the nokia.
Then restart the OSPF process on the cisco.
repost the debug.
The preferred way is to enable OSPF on the interfaces with the network statement and remove the redistribute connected subnets.
If you don't want to form an adjacency on those interfaces (eg 10.15.1.0) you could use the passive-interface command under the ospf config e.g. passive-interface Vlan2. This stops hellos being sent out of those interfaces and so prevents adjacencies being formed.
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: donjohnstonPosted on 2009-09-09 at 06:54:32ID: 25291291
I don't think I follow what you want.
If you've got OSPF running between the CP firewall and the Cisco switches. Why do you want the static routes?