|
[x]
Posted via EE Mobile
|
|
| Search, ask, and monitor your questions on the go with EE Mobile. Visit Experts Exchange from your mobile device and never be out of touch again. |
|
|
|
|
|
[x]
The Solution Rating System
|
|
| With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating. - The Grade of the Solution
- The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
- The Number of Author and Expert Comments
- The Number of Experts Contributing
- The Feedback of the Community
Your Input Matters Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site. If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support. Thank you! |
|
|
|
|
Asked by xav1963 in Domain Name Service (DNS), Windows 2003 Server, Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP)
I have inherited a small NT domain with 1 forest, 1 domain, 1 dc (2003 Server Std.) and about 15 clients (XP Pro). I noticed that there is a constant DNS error of event 6702 - DNS has updated its own host record...Since there is no other DS-integrated peer, it says I can ignore it but I hate to have errors. Also, the dc( and therefore the domain) is named without a top-level. It is server.xyz, no server.xyz.local, which again I prefer. Thew clients seem to be working ok, accessing network shares, etc. The DHCP server is setup though with 015 DNS domain name option as xyz.local....why everything is working I don't know. And the DHCP address leases auotmatically include RAS leases to the dc and again they are server.xyz.local while all the clients are client.xyz. Should I be concerned here or leave as is? I was even considering running the domain rename tool. My concern now would be if in the future if all of the sudden I start having issues added clients to the domain, especially more Vista or 7 clients. What should I do to fix some of these issues?
20091111-EE-VQP-92 - Hierarchy / EE_QW_3_20080625