Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of mrbayIt
mrbayItFlag for United States of America

asked on

DNS reverse zone active directory

hi, i have a question about reverse zones for my active directory environment.

Lets say site A, is a super netted site. 172.20.0.0/19
within that supernet, are smaller networks

subnet A   172.20.0.0/23
subnet B   172.20.2.0/23
Subnet C   172.20.4.0/23
Subnet D   172.20.6.0/23
Subnet E    172.20.8.0/22
Subnet F     172.20.12.0/22
Subnet G    172.20.16.0/20

For reverse zones, is there a way to define the entire subnet either by the /19, or example subnet A with the /23 or do i have to define each one the way it is presented in the wizard, as in since 32 total subnets in that /19
i would have to define each /24 subnet?
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Chris Dent
Chris Dent
Flag of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Yes, classless reverse lookup zone can be created but there is actually one situation when it will make sense – when you are delegated with managing a subnet of a classful network. Otherwise, just stick with the classful ARPA standard. The following example is for Windows Server 2000 but it will work in 2008 too. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc961414.aspx
Classless zones are entirely reliant on delegation from a classful zone. It needs a CNAME to rewrite from one zone to another. You'd still need to create the /16, and your overhead would be significantly greater.

Chris
Be aware that classless reverse lookup zones cannot be dynamically updated. This is mentioned in the article linked above, but it's easy to miss:

No Dynamic Updates on a Classless Reverse Lookup Zone

I strongly suspect this also applies to Server 2012 and 2012 R2.
(for confirmation) It will, the nature of classless zones prohibits (RFC compliant) dynamic update methods.

Chris