Advertisement

08.12.2008 at 07:30AM PDT, ID: 23641304
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

8.0

SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition - Cluster with ACTIVE / ACTIVE / ACTIVE / PASSIVE

Asked by inverted_2000 in SQL Server 2005, MS SQL Server, Windows 2003 Server

Tags: , ,

Hey all,

I've got a systems that is already in place that runs 3 HP blades (Dual Quad Core Xeon / 16GB memory), Windows 2003 R2 Enterprise, and SQL Server Standard 2005 SP2.  All software is x64.
This configurateion runs:
(ACTIVE / ACTIVE / PASSIVE)
as
(DB / Reporting /Passive Failover)

My boss wants to add a 4th node to this Standard Edition cluster for a new SharePoint DB.
This would share the Passive node with the other 2 nodes that are already in place.
Remember this is standard edition SQL Server.

So a new HP Blade running Server 2003 R2 EE with SQL Server Standard 2005 SP2 is brought online.

We run through the SQL server setup and it looks okay with the clustering setup in SQL Server...but it stops and throws the out that we need to pick additional nodes to be a part of the virtual server.  It has the new node selected "Svr4DB" but the other 3 nodes are listed as unavailable:

Svr1DB - A SCC check failed on the node
Svr2DB - A SCC check failed on the node
Svr3DB - A SCC check failed on the node

Does this mean that it's not going to allow another node into the Single Copy Cluster (SCC) setup?

Thanks peeps...and would upgrading to EE SQL Svr fix this?Start Free Trial
[+][-]08.12.2008 at 08:15PM PDT, ID: 22218785

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]08.19.2008 at 06:50AM PDT, ID: 22259712

View this solution now by starting your 7-day free trial. Setting up your free trial is quick, easy, and secure. We will return you to this solution, unlocked, when you're done.

 

About this solution

Zones: SQL Server 2005, MS SQL Server, Windows 2003 Server
Tags: SQL server 2005, Cluster, SQL 2005 Cluster
Sign Up Now!
Solution Provided By: inverted_2000
Participating Experts: 1
Solution Grade: A
 
 
[+][-]08.19.2008 at 07:06AM PDT, ID: 22259866

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
 
Loading Advertisement...
20080716-EE-VQP-32 / EE_QW_EXPERT_20070906