October 13, 2008 11:35pm pdt

1. lrmoore 101,540
2. batry_boy 67,460
3. RobWill 31,300
4. arnold 23,500
5. dpk_wal 22,075
6. ebjers 16,130
7. Voltz-dk 14,920
8. rsivanandan 12,675
9. mkielar 12,500
10. harbor235 12,000
11. MrHusy 11,000
12. Cyclops3... 10,900
13. SteveH_UK 9,000
14. mwecom... 7,985
15. trinak96 7,865
16. _jesper_ 7,375
17. Qlemo 6,840
18. AugustTen 6,500
19. decoleur 6,000
20. PeteLong 5,975
21. Quori 5,500
22. bkepford 5,000
22. Jay_Gridley 5,000
24. stuknhaw... 4,950
25. keith_ala... 4,700
25. from_exp 4,700

1. lrmoore 360,882
2. RobWill 186,524
3. batry_boy 113,835
4. richrumble 111,117
5. rsivanandan 58,392
6. ahoffmann 44,523
7. arnold 36,760
8. Cyclops3... 35,775
9. grblades 35,012
10. pseudocy... 34,059
11. dpk_wal 32,075
12. harbor235 30,398
13. tim_holman 27,445
14. kbbcnet 26,524
15. ebjers 25,140
16. decoleur 25,014
17. Tolomir 23,651
18. sciwriter 23,050
19. keith_ala... 22,600
20. giltjr 22,145
21. Voltz-dk 21,520
22. calvinetter 20,950
23. PowerIT 20,560
24. chris_cal... 19,770
25. trinak96 18,365

05.25.2007 at 12:42PM PDT, ID: 22595575

	[x] Attachment Details

[x]

The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

The Grade of the Solution
The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
The Number of Author and Expert Comments
The Number of Experts Contributing
The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

8.2

Firebox X700 error message .... looking for answer and explanation.

Asked by ArmyGroo in IPSec Security Protocol, Networking Hardware Firewalls, Enterprise Firewalls

Tags: isa_vendorid, peer, xauth, firebox

Firebox X700 error message. I think the external people are the problem and changed something so we can not get a key. But could someone explain the below message in english and confirm or deny my assumption.

05/25/07 14:26 kernel: ipsec: Acquiring keys for channel 3
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: Acquiring key for channel/policy 3/0
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: Key acquire proxyraddr = (External Address)
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: Key acquire proxyladdr = (Our Visible external IP)
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: ipsec_acquire_keys: laddr = (Our Visible external IP), raddr = (External facility application)
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: TO (External facility application) MM-HDR ISA_SA ISA_VENDORID ISA_VENDORID ISA_VENDORID ISA_VENDORID
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: FROM (External facility application) MM-HDR ISA_SA ISA_VENDORID ISA_VENDORID
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: TO (External facility application) MM-HDR ISA_KE ISA_NONCE NAT-D NAT-D
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: FROM (External facility application) MM-HDR ISA_KE ISA_NONCE ISA_VENDORID ISA_VENDORID ISA_VENDORID ISA_VENDORID NAT-D NAT-D
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: Rejecting peer XAUTH request: not configured
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: TO (External facility application) MM-HDR* ISA_ID ISA_HASH
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: FROM (External facility application) MM-HDR* ISA_ID ISA_HASH ISA_VENDORID
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: Phase 1 completed as initiator
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: Sending INITIAL_CONTACT message
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: TO (External facility application) IF-HDR* -CCF19938 ISA_HASH ISA_NOTIFY
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: Deleting old phase 1 SA for (External facility application)
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: Deleting SA: peer (External facility application)
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: my_cookie 62F4F4A2CC00EC2A
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: peer_cookie 904235AA03103161
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: Getting IPSEC preferences as Initiator propnum=1, mode=(Tunnel), laddr=(Our Visible external IP), raddr=(External facility application)
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: Getting IPSEC preferences as Initiator propnum=2, mode=(Tunnel), laddr=(Our Visible external IP), raddr=(External facility application)
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: TO (External facility application) QM-HDR* -BBA48BE9 ISA_HASH ISA_SA ISA_NONCE ISA_ID ISA_ID
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: FROM (External facility application) IF-HDR* -5C2A28E9 ISA_HASH ISA_DELETE
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: ipsec_cancel_acquire: Called as Initiator
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: Cancelled acquire for channel (3)
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: Deleting SA: peer (External facility application)
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: my_cookie 0EE971C6B62B4289
05/25/07 14:26 iked[145]: peer_cookie EEE4381AA322B115
05/25/07 14:27 chat-ttyS2[543]: Can't get terminal parameters: Input/output error
05/25/07 14:27 pppd[131]: Connect script failed

Start Free Trial

Keywords: Firebox X700 error message ...…

	Title
1	VPN Setup on a firebox X55e
2	Firebox X550e fast Term Serv - Slo…
3	Create Firewall Policy which allow Wat…
4	VPN Tunnel between Cisco 877 AD…
5	Watchguard Firebox Edge
6	Samba over vpn ipsec tunnel

Loading Advertisement...

20080716-EE-VQP-32

Firebox X700 error message .... looking for answer and explanation.

Asked by ArmyGroo in IPSec Security Protocol, Networking Hardware Firewalls, Enterprise Firewalls

Tags: isa_vendorid, peer, xauth, firebox

About this solution