Advertisement

10.19.2007 at 10:32AM PDT, ID: 22905125
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

8.6

Redundant connections to sites - floating statics and load-balanced

Asked by shashiaj in IPSec Security Protocol, Virtual Private Networking (VPN), Cisco PIX Firewall

Tags: , , ,

I need to set up a redundant connection between sites starting with 2 and eventually moving to 4.

The environment is using OSPF.

There are private T-1s between the sites currently. What we're trying to do is:
1. If the private T-1 goes down we want to have traffic route through the PIX across the our internet circuits, via IPSEC to the affect site and vice versa. I realize setting up a floating static route would essentially accomplish this goal, but let's talk about a caveat.
The caveat is, what if the router goes down instead of the private T-1? Do I have to add the same floating static route to our redundant core switches? the core switches are running HSRP, also.........

and/or

2. Configuring the router and the PIX IPSEC connection across the internet - load-balancing.


I'd like to see some examples of both. Also, keeping in mind the fact that the configuration has to be able to be host more than just the 2 sites. Basically making the 4 sites fully meshed to each other.

Thanks!Start Free Trial
[+][-]10.19.2007 at 12:22PM PDT, ID: 20111539

View this solution now by starting your 7-day free trial. Setting up your free trial is quick, easy, and secure. We will return you to this solution, unlocked, when you're done.

 

About this solution

Zones: IPSec Security Protocol, Virtual Private Networking (VPN), Cisco PIX Firewall
Tags: redundant, connections, ospf, floating
Sign Up Now!
Solution Provided By: lrmoore
Participating Experts: 1
Solution Grade: A
 
 
[+][-]10.19.2007 at 01:10PM PDT, ID: 20111936

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]10.19.2007 at 01:11PM PDT, ID: 20111945

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
 
Loading Advertisement...
20080716-EE-VQP-32 / EE_QW_1_20070628