August 29, 2008 04:19pm pdt

1. andyalder 155,816
2. meyersd 90,697
3. rindi 70,111
4. garycase 69,545
5. dovidmichel 47,217
6. Lonewolf70 43,062
7. PUNKY 41,402
8. lnkevin 34,976
9. leew 29,289
10. robocat 29,000
11. nobus 26,709
12. bhanukir7 18,185
13. honmapog 17,850
14. SysExpert 16,700
15. akirhol 15,050
16. dbrunton 14,747
17. Randy_B... 13,729
18. RockChalk 13,440
19. DevilWAH 12,494
20. ryansoto 11,414
21. sifuedition 11,303
22. kode99 11,150
23. kkrans 10,672
24. connollyg 10,350
25. Callandor 10,200

1. andyalder 363,169
2. meyersd 152,227
3. rindi 131,761
4. SysExpert 114,027
5. PUNKY 107,739
6. garycase 105,760
7. leew 91,024
8. dovidmichel 74,599
9. lnkevin 62,887
10. nobus 58,491
11. kkrans 44,978
12. Lonewolf70 43,062
13. robocat 36,432
14. kode99 32,636
15. honmapog 31,750
16. Callandor 30,575
17. pgm554 28,404
18. RockChalk 27,535
19. jamietoner 24,202
20. Mr-Madc... 23,732
21. WallD 23,533
22. bhanukir7 23,260
23. iamthecre... 20,950
24. sirbounty 18,200
25. DevilWAH 18,144

01.15.2008 at 06:34AM PST, ID: 23083929

	[x] Attachment Details

SAS vs iSCSI vs Fibre SAN vs NAS

Asked by Dr_Ego in Storage Technology

I am trying to find a solution for my company. Currently we have physical servers with 15,000RPM disks.

For performance, what is faster and reliable...

Booting up from a 15K SAS disk or 2GB Fibre SAN solution? If I boot up from a SAN, will I see a performance hit as opposed to internal SAS?

What is faster? iSCSI, Fibre Channel, or regular 15K SAS?
Start Free Trial

Keywords: SAS vs iSCSI vs Fibre SAN vs NAS

	Title
1	Exchange 2007 CCR question. No…
2	High Performance Secure iSCSI Target …
3	Windows home drives and iSCSI
4	iSCSI and RAID0 (yuk!)
5	iscsi support dell cx500
6	iSCSI

Loading Advertisement...

20080716-EE-VQP-32 / EE_QW_2_20070628

SAS vs iSCSI vs Fibre SAN vs NAS

Asked by Dr_Ego in Storage Technology

About this solution