I came across that in my research but I was wondering if anyone actually had any experience applying QOS to an etherchannel interface (or the physical interfaces) and what practices worked for them.
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsHow would one go about prioritizing voice traffic on an etherchannel interface on a Cisco 3750?
I'm not sure of SRR can be applied on an etherchannel interface, or if its better to apply it to the physical interface, or just to create a policy map and apply it to the etherchannel interface (if possible).
Thanks for any help.
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
the common practice is to define where your trust boundry is and define QoS there, trust it on uplinks and set policy on lower bandwidth interfaces like WAN links.
I would do a modified QoS on access ports and then typically carve out 4 or 5 queues on the WAN and not worry about trunks or etherchannels just trust the dscp values on traffic passing over them. typically the WAN QoS will carve out 1/3 of the bandwidth for voice and on a 4 Gig ether channel that would be 1.33 Gigs... which would be appropriate if you wanted to allow for one half of a college campus to call the other half at the same time. me thinks not so much in the deploymets I touch.
hope this helps,
-t
Thanks to the both of you for responding.
I guess where I'm going with this is that if a situation should occur where there is congestion on the etherchannel interface, I would want it to prioritize voice traffic over data traffic, is there a recommended way to do this?
Am I wrong in thinking this way? I don't want to do more harm than good but my client really wants to be sure that voice traffic will get priority in any situation.
in the simplest qos deployment by configuring qos on all the switches and classifying the traffic at the switchport using auto qos the voice traffic will be prioritized based upon the default hardware queues defined on each switch. the software queues where you have to allocate specific bandwidth to each class of service is on routers only.
if you have congestion on an etherchannel that is impacting voice services than you have bigger issues than qos.
-t
for more info on what you can do with QoS you might want to check out the Enterprise QoS Solution Reference Network Design Guide from Cisco at http://www.cisco.com/unive
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: cat6509Posted on 2008-12-05 at 14:37:53ID: 23109520
"If you have EtherChannel ports configured on your switch, you must configure QoS classification, policing, mapping, and queueing on the individual physical ports that comprise the EtherChannel. You must decide whether the QoS configuration should match on all ports in the EtherChannel. "
/docs/swit ches/lan/c atalyst375 0/ software /release/1 2.2_25_see /configura tion/guide / swqos.htm l#wp120068 1
http://www.cisco.com/en/US
Have fun with that one. ;)