I see you are grabbing EF marked traffig (hopefully RTP) and putting it in your priority queue, what I don't see is any signalling traffig getting handled by this policy. Typically signalling is marked as AF31.
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsWe have recently added some new Avaya phone systems to our network and are utilizing VOIP to connect our remote sites to our main site. I have worked with the phone vendor in configuring the QOS in the routers to support this, but I am not sure I like the way it is configured.
We have 9 remote sites connecting to our main site via Metro Ethernet. Each site has varying CIR from the carrier. Only 3 of our remote sites have VOIP phones currently, and in the future we will be adding additional sites.
We have 1 policy-map that is applied to the physical interface where all the metro-E subinterfaces are.
I found a link on Cisco that discussed creating a hierarchical policy :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US
It showed the following example which looks like it might be a better and more flexible way to do this :
policy-map child
class voice
priority 512
policy-map parent
class class-default
shape average 2000000
service-policy child
interface ethernet0/0.1
service-policy parent
I like this because I can create a policy-map for each site, and apply them directly to the subinterfaces, rather than the entire physical interface.
Any opinions on this? Would the hierarchical policy method do what I want? (shape the link to carriers CIR and prioritize voice traffic up to 512kbps)
The code below is an example of what we are currently using. It is modified from the actual config to be posted here.
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
Yea I don't have any signalling in there at this time, mostly concerned with the actual VOIP traffic and getting that locked down.
I just really like the idea of setting up the QOS on a per sub-interface setting, rather than on the entire physical interface that houses all the subinterfaces.
I went ahead and applied the hierarchical qos policies last night and from what I can see, it is working as I was hoping. If anyone can point out any negatives to this method, I'd be glad to hear them! :)
Thanks
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: cathcharPosted on 2009-07-20 at 09:42:20ID: 24896690
Any assistance would be appreciated. Thank you! I have been browsing web and Experts-exchange for any similar postings and have yet to locate anything that helps me. If you have a link to a similar question, that would be very helpful as well. Thanks!