Now I have done as you suggested and it still does not work. Here is my table
Active Routes:
Network Address Netmask Gateway Address Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.34 1
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.1 192.168.2.34 1
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.34 192.168.1.34 1
192.168.1.34 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
192.168.1.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.34 192.168.1.34 1
192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.34 192.168.2.34 1
192.168.2.34 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.2.34 192.168.2.34 1
224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.1.34 192.168.1.34 1
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.2.34 0.0.0.0 1
Main Topics
Browse All Topics





by: grayePosted on 2005-12-12 at 18:40:13ID: 15471364
Hang on a second...
Unless you've typed the IP addresses incorrectly in your question, you've a world of a mess with you addressing scheme.
Why would you have two separate networks with overlapping IP addresses? It would make a heck of a lot more sense to separate the two networks into *different* IP address spaces:
Network #1 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1 (as the gateway)
Network #2 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.1 (as the gateway)
If you did that, the routing between the two networks should be trival...