Wow!!!! That was a quick response!!
If i had named my internal domain as xyz.local then i would not have had a problem becuase i would then keep the extranet domain name as xyz.com and there would be no clash. I guess my thinkning is right along these lines.
The option A you gave would not be suitable for us.
I am not sure how i would implement option B. Suppose i create a DNS zone as external.xyz.com then how does name resolution take place? Meaning that according to the DNS resolution method the DNS server will look for a DNS zone as xyz.com and then that will point to external.xyz.com. So again i still have xyz.com being in the extranet. Yes the difference is that there will be a separate internal.xyz.com........ho
So what other options do i have that lets me set up an external DNS server which would still have xyz.com as the zone name and yet not replicate internal DNS traffic??
Main Topics
Browse All Topics





by: diggisaurPosted on 2004-03-12 at 14:04:07ID: 10584855
I believe your google.com results are also what Microsoft recommends because the secondary can only be read from and not written to thus eliminating the sabotage of the server.
But obviously you have sensitive records you do you want to replicate out from the inside. I know Microsoft also recommends creating separate namespaces from internal and external use.
Examples:
A).
xyz.com = internal, abc.com = external
B).
internal.xyz.com = internal child zone
external.xyz.com = external child zone
Either way the separate external namespace only contains the records you want made available to the public.
For internal access you simply create static records to external.xyz.com on your name server that redirects to your external DNS server.