- For individual users
- Instant access to solutions
- Ask your tech questions
- Start your 30-day Free Trial
Main Topics
Browse All Topicshi all,
I have a router to router vpn setup on two netopia r910's between two static dsl connections. The vpn works fine and so do the clients connected directly to the r910. I have a win2k3 server setup on side 1 which is handling dhcp requests. on side two, the dhcp requests are being forwarded to side 1. all computers (winxp machines) that are directly connected to the r910 on side are successfully retrieving dhcp info and are connected to the network as well as being able to loginto the domain of the win2k3 server.
my problem is when I add another router behind the r910. I have a wireless router connected, and it receives dhcp info properly from the side1 server. but when a wireless client connects to the network, it is having problems finding the dhcp info. I have disabled dhcp on the wireless router and also configured the ip address of the router with an ip on the same subnet and with the same subnet masks as other clients.
If I turn dhcp off on the wireless router, and assign static information to match that of my wan ip addressing scheme, i'm unable to browse. If I have dhcp enabled on the wireless router, then my wireless client will retrieve an ip address to that of the local lan settings of the router and will be able to browse the internet. In both scenarios, the wireless clients cannot even connect or ping the netopia gateway client or any other machines connected to the netopia router via cable.
Without going into the details of the configuration or capabilities of the wireless router, what must be done in order for the wireless clients to be able to acces
thanks in advance for any comments or suggestions.
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: meverestPosted on 2005-12-26 at 17:06:28ID: 15553052
Hello,
there are generally two types of wireless access point. One is a wireless router that has different subnets on the wired and wireless networks and routes data between the wired and wireless segments, the other is just a bridge that has the same subnet on both sides and simply bridges the wired and wirelkess interfaces.
>> Without going into the details of the configuration or capabilities of the wireless router
well, without great detail, the simplest method is the latter - just bridge the wireless network to the wired net. Then the wireless clients will pick up dhcp addresses the same as anything on the wired network.
BUT (big 'but') although bridging is a technically simple solution, it is not really a very efficient way to do it. The routed method would be preferable, allowing the wireless router itself to issue dhcp addresses to wireless clients, and set up the router to NAT all wireless traffic to the wired network. Many wireless router devices have an "internet port" for this purpose.
Routing is always much more bandwidth efficient than bridging.
cheers.