no just 3 or 4.
Main Topics
Browse All Topicshi, i have this loginscript in my Wi2k DC, for Win XP boxes it runs fine but for Win98 users it dont.
$u=ucase(@USERID)
use Z: "\\Proliant\User$\" + $u
someone know what shoull i do for win98?
regards
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
you know, i tryed via Windows Explorer and i got some strange behaviour. The network share name is User$, which is a folder that contains a subfolder per user account in the domain:
\\Server\User$\...
Anna
Jhon
Fred
etc...
At logon script i get the account name and mapp the subfolder accordingly:
$u=ucase(@USERID)
use Z: "\\Server1\User$\" + $u
The above works fine for WinXP users, but not for few Win98 boxes.
Now when i try to map the drive via Windows Explorer ('Z' to '\\Server1\User$\Fred' for instance) in any of those Win98 boxes it maps Z to \\Server1\User$ instead, so it seems that Win98 do not map to a folder level beyond the network share.
How to workaround this.?
regards and thanks very much
In 9x and NT4 that's by design. You can map to the root of a share, but not sub folders of shares. This issue was fixed in 2k, XP, and 2003 server, however because your client is 98, I think you might be stuck.
You could create a share directly at the userid level. That way it would be a root share, and the 9x clients could map directly to it.
Hope this helps.
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: 1r2d2c3poPosted on 2007-01-29 at 09:38:25ID: 18421155
Possible LFN issue.
Are your user id's longer then 8 characters?