Wireless Access Point to Wireless Access Point Configuration

Hi,

From what you tell it seems that you're running an ideal configuration. To use the network in AP/ Repeater mode is your only alternative. In that it is this mode what provides you to use addresses from the same subnet in two buildings. If you had used routing instead of bridging you'd had PC's in diffrent buildings assigned addresses from different subnets.  It is to allow you could route packets from one network to another. In short bridging is a low level protocol and it runs with Hardware Addreseses rather than Routing which is a high level protocol and runs with TCP/IP addresses.

In the internet world packet sizes are around 1500 bytes. Since each device who wants to communicate each other knows that and sets the packet size around 1500 bytes no problems occur. but in Intranets it is sometimes a good idea to keep packet sizes larger. Because this provides higher when  large chunks of data are transferred from one end to the other where communication speeds re relatively higher in intranets. As your posting suggests in your network this value is near 32K.

What happens when a large packets like 32K wants to be transferred over a network which has a smaller packet size say, 1500 byte is large packet to be divided several small size packets during transmission and receiving end just collects them all and assembles the packet. but if Larger packet size is not at a size that ii not powers of the smaller size. The packets can not always be assembled at receiving end. When a packet could not been assembled at receiving end it requests whole packet to be retransmitted from the sender.

I believe you problems lies in this size discrepancy. Let me check your config files closely and let you know about what to change.

Will you please post MTU sizes from both AP and Router ?

also believe it or not you may get a better result by lowering the input power of the radio to the antenna. If you push out too much energy it can be like holding a loud speaker to someones ear and cause a poor quality link

Thank you both for commenting.
Here are responses to your comments:

v46n:
I'll download mini.php and test wireless network throughput tomorrow.
No "signal over noise level" reading available on AP.
Channel 1 ( Hmmmmm.....I have not tried changing to different channel).
It is in the middle of nowhere....I can't imagine any interference.
I was unable to get host / "wireless client" config to work...only Host / Repeater seems to work-it's my understanding only 1 PC would work in building#2 if "wireless client" used on AP in building #2 (?).
I'll try changing preamble  from short to long tomorrow.
"Statically set the speed lower" ......I think you are referring to the "Data Rate"?....I'll try setting the "Data Rate" from "Auto" to 36Mb.
"Lowering the input power of the Radio to the antenna"....should I try this on both
AP's .....or just the AP Attached to the Omni-Directional antenna?....good analogy.

KeremE:
I agree....."Size" does appear to matter in this problem  :-)
I looked on both D-Link DWL-2100 AP's and the Belkin Router and could not locate a setting or stat for MTU. The only time I've noticed this setting is on Linksys Routers (Maximum Transfer Unit)...if this is what the MTU is your referring to.
Since "Size" appears to affect network performance....do you think v46n's suggestion of chaging the "Data Rate" and "input power" settings will help?

Thank you both again for commenting...I await your expert opinions.
John B

Frankly I'd try picking up another directional antenna and sticking the "repeater antenna" directly into building #2 and run off the ethernet ports on that. The router is rated at up to 400m anyway outdoors, so the use of two directional antennas should boost that a little (just be sure to line them up precisely!) If you do do that, try enabling the Extreme G. Also do a spectrum test using a program like Network Stumbler. http://www.netstumbler.com/downloads/ That software can also tell you your signal to noise ratio.

-Guy

once your thoughtput test is done with the data rate on auto you will probably see a result much lower then 36mb. If this is the case, try setting it really low to like 5.5 and run the test just to compare results. You can lower the power on both radios or just 1, its better the lower both to 3/4 input power then one to 1/2 input power.

netstumbler wont really help you out unless you have a wireless card with a removal antenna that you can plug directly into one of the antennas to see the true signal over noise.

Thank you all for commenting,
I have done some preliminary testing and found that the AP setup as a "Repeater" is powering off (the power light blinks then returns to solid) during heavy data transfer......data other than normal internet data. Ther are no power delivery problems in the location where the "Repeater" AP is due to no power problems with other devices...switches, camera DVR.etc.
I have removed both AP's, attached the original antenna's  and tested the same exact setup in another enviroment. With the AP's closer together due to smaller antennas, setup as is with no changes to power, data rate, etc, they work flawlessly...I can ping 65500bytes of data 50x w/0% loss at 30ms-45ms.
I will be returning to the site today where the antenna's are and re-install the AP's.
v46n: Is it possible that the transmit power set at full could cause the AP to reboot? I will work with the power settings as you mentioned...should I try removing the Wi-Fi booster between the AP and outdoor omnidirectional antenna to see the result? It appears that the problem is releated to equipment other than the AP's....antenna's, booster, cabling (?).
Thanks biofishfreak: we went with the Omni-directional setup since we originally had 2 buildings that needed to communicate with the main building with the AP setup as "Access Point" (that 2nd building was crushed by a train car during loading but we did manage to salvage the AP...not the antenna  :-/  )
Plus we use it in the surrounding area to connect with our laptops.....we only use the laptops for internet access so heavy data transfer while connecting to the Server is not a problem....it's only in building #2 with the workstations connecting to the Server.
Since the beginning I never enable SuperG Turbo since I was advised against it from the location I purchased the equipment from.
I will update this post evening of 5/15/09 with my results from changing power settings per v46n.
Any additional info is appreciated.
Thanks all,
John B

Greetings all,
Thank you all for your input...the problem has been resolved using the following settings:

1. Changed from channel 1 to 6 on the "Access Point" AP - "Repeater" AP set to automatically use the channel from the "Access Point" AP.
2. Changed the Fragment Length from 2346 to 1500
    Changed the RTS Length from 2346 to 1500.
3. Turned on Wireless Setting of "Super G".
Data Rate still set at "Auto" and Transmit Power still set at "Full".

After making these changes I am able to ping with a packet size of 65500bytes  with 0% loss and average rate of 24ms between the AP's. Before making these settings I was only able to ping with a max packet size of 32000bytes.
We are no longer experiencing network disconnects during increased traffic usage....we only experience a slow down in the transfer rate.

Thank you again to all for assisting in solving our problem!

John B