|
[x]
Posted via EE Mobile
|
|
| Search, ask, and monitor your questions on the go with EE Mobile. Visit Experts Exchange from your mobile device and never be out of touch again. |
|
|
|
|
|
[x]
The Solution Rating System
|
|
| With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating. - The Grade of the Solution
- The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
- The Number of Author and Expert Comments
- The Number of Experts Contributing
- The Feedback of the Community
Your Input Matters Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site. If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support. Thank you! |
|
|
|
|
Asked by Jason_Wilocx in Linux, Red Hat Linux
I'm running RHEL 5.4 on two systems that were built by me nearly identically. I've granted limited rights to a DBA. The boxes were built as MySQL servers for a test/dev environment.
My trouble... If I run df I get a differential of about 18.4GB in available space. Both servers are setup with the same size volume. I need to identify the cause of the disparity in used disk space. I've tried a couple different things, ran as root;
# du -sh /* | sort -nr | more
Output from this shows only about a 3GB total size difference when I compare the two servers. Does this command not provide recursive size results for the root folders?
# find / -type f -size +50000k -exec ls -lh {} \; | awk '{ print $9 ": " $5}'
Results are roughly the same as above, nothing apparent to account for the 18.4GB difference. Assuming I dont have a massive number of <50MB files.
What tips can you provide to help me locate the cause of this disparity?
20091118-EE-VQP-93 - Hierarchy / EE_QW_3_20080625