Advertisement

07.19.2007 at 10:48AM PDT, ID: 22707725
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

The Great SBS Wizard Challenge
Tags: sbs, wizard
I've now been posting here on EE for about three years.  Most of that time spent in the Small Business Server Zone (ne Topic Area).  There have been a number of recurring themes in the few thousand questions I've participated in during that time, but none that causes more controversy than whether the SBS Wizards should be used, or if you can configure an SBS without them.

Since I've always taken the stand that in order to properly configure an SBS you must use all the wizards.  I guess this has often been interpreted as "you cannot properly configure an SBS unless you use all the wizards".  But since the wizards are really just advanced scripting tools, you could obviously make all of the same settings or even different ones manually.

So, the question I now pose to all who care to respond is:  Why?

Why would you want to manually make these settings when there is a tool that will do it for you in a fraction of the time?  On this point, I believe there is no debate on whether or not working with the wizards will take less time if one were to make ALL of the same settings manually.  The issues seem to be that either the wizards do things that you don't want them to do, or that you have special circumstances which seem to conflict with the way the wizards configure things.  So, to clarify the question, I will ask, "What situations have you found that they prevent you from implementing a customized solution?"  or "What situations have you found that the wizards do something you don't want them to do and your only option is to not run them (ie, the wizard makes 10 settings and you like 7 of them but don't like 3)?

Your answer should have a concrete example of a situation as well as an explanation of how the wizard causes the problem.

Of course if you disagree with my time premise, (that making the exact same settings manually would take longer), I'd be interested in hearing about that as well.

I would have posted this in the Experts Lounge area, but since it's focused on SBS only and many of you don't even go to the Experts Lounge, it makes more sense here.

Thanks in advance for your comments.

Jeff
TechSoEasy
1:
2:
**Removed from Puzzles/Riddles Zone by TechSoEasy -- Microsoft Zone Advisor**
     it was placed there by mistake
Start your free trial to view this solution
Question Stats
Zone: OS
Question Asked By: TechSoEasy
Solution Provided By: leew
Participating Experts: 10
Solution Grade: A
Views: 8
Translate:
Loading Advertisement...
07.19.2007 at 11:04AM PDT, ID: 19524438

Rank: Genius

All comments and solutions are available to Premium Service Members only.

Start your 7 day free trial and see for yourself why Experts Exchange is the easiest and most proven technology resource in the world. Get Started

Already a member? Login to view this solution.

 
07.19.2007 at 11:27AM PDT, ID: 19524701

All comments and solutions are available to Premium Service Members only.

Start your 7 day free trial and see for yourself why Experts Exchange is the easiest and most proven technology resource in the world. Get Started

Already a member? Login to view this solution.

 
07.24.2007 at 07:38PM PDT, ID: 19562036

All comments and solutions are available to Premium Service Members only.

Start your 7 day free trial and see for yourself why Experts Exchange is the easiest and most proven technology resource in the world. Get Started

Already a member? Login to view this solution.

 
07.24.2007 at 08:41PM PDT, ID: 19562470

Rank: Master

All comments and solutions are available to Premium Service Members only.

Start your 7 day free trial and see for yourself why Experts Exchange is the easiest and most proven technology resource in the world. Get Started

Already a member? Login to view this solution.

 
07.24.2007 at 09:43PM PDT, ID: 19562735

Rank: Wizard

All comments and solutions are available to Premium Service Members only.

Start your 7 day free trial and see for yourself why Experts Exchange is the easiest and most proven technology resource in the world. Get Started

Already a member? Login to view this solution.

 
07.25.2007 at 07:53AM PDT, ID: 19565925

Rank: Genius

All comments and solutions are available to Premium Service Members only.

Start your 7 day free trial and see for yourself why Experts Exchange is the easiest and most proven technology resource in the world. Get Started

Already a member? Login to view this solution.

 
07.27.2007 at 05:37PM PDT, ID: 19583162

All comments and solutions are available to Premium Service Members only.

Start your 7 day free trial and see for yourself why Experts Exchange is the easiest and most proven technology resource in the world. Get Started

Already a member? Login to view this solution.

 
07.30.2007 at 05:28AM PDT, ID: 19591890

Rank: Master

All comments and solutions are available to Premium Service Members only.

Start your 7 day free trial and see for yourself why Experts Exchange is the easiest and most proven technology resource in the world. Get Started

Already a member? Login to view this solution.

 
07.31.2007 at 10:01PM PDT, ID: 19606364

All comments and solutions are available to Premium Service Members only.

Start your 7 day free trial and see for yourself why Experts Exchange is the easiest and most proven technology resource in the world. Get Started

Already a member? Login to view this solution.

 
08.02.2007 at 08:51AM PDT, ID: 19618127

Rank: Master

All comments and solutions are available to Premium Service Members only.

Start your 7 day free trial and see for yourself why Experts Exchange is the easiest and most proven technology resource in the world. Get Started

Already a member? Login to view this solution.

 
08.02.2007 at 09:08AM PDT, ID: 19618300

Rank: Genius

All comments and solutions are available to Premium Service Members only.

Start your 7 day free trial and see for yourself why Experts Exchange is the easiest and most proven technology resource in the world. Get Started

Already a member? Login to view this solution.

 
08.02.2007 at 02:23PM PDT, ID: 19621020

Rank: Wizard

All comments and solutions are available to Premium Service Members only.

Start your 7 day free trial and see for yourself why Experts Exchange is the easiest and most proven technology resource in the world. Get Started

Already a member? Login to view this solution.

 
08.27.2007 at 05:41AM PDT, ID: 19775034

Rank: Guru

All comments and solutions are available to Premium Service Members only.

Start your 7 day free trial and see for yourself why Experts Exchange is the easiest and most proven technology resource in the world. Get Started

Already a member? Login to view this solution.

 
10.12.2007 at 02:12AM PDT, ID: 20063905

All comments and solutions are available to Premium Service Members only.

Start your 7 day free trial and see for yourself why Experts Exchange is the easiest and most proven technology resource in the world. Get Started

Already a member? Login to view this solution.

 
10.12.2007 at 02:29AM PDT, ID: 20063971

Rank: Master

All comments and solutions are available to Premium Service Members only.

Start your 7 day free trial and see for yourself why Experts Exchange is the easiest and most proven technology resource in the world. Get Started

Already a member? Login to view this solution.

 
10.12.2007 at 02:42AM PDT, ID: 20064017

All comments and solutions are available to Premium Service Members only.

Start your 7 day free trial and see for yourself why Experts Exchange is the easiest and most proven technology resource in the world. Get Started

Already a member? Login to view this solution.

 
 
Loading Advertisement...
Microsoft
  • Internet Protocols
  • Applications
  • Development
  • OS
  • Hardware
  • Windows Security
Apple
  • Operating Systems
  • Hardware
  • Programming
  • Networking
  • Software
Internet
  • Search Engines
  • File Sharing
  • WebTrends / Stats
  • Spy / Ad Blockers
  • Web Browsers
  • New Net Users
  • Web Development
  • Chat / IM
  • Anti Spam
  • Web Servers
  • Anti-Virus
  • Email Clients
Gamers
  • Tips
  • Online / MMORPG
  • Puzzle
  • Emulators
  • Action / Adventure
  • Role Playing
  • Consoles
  • Game Programming
  • Strategy
  • Sports
  • Misc
  • Computer Games
Digital Living
  • Hardware
  • New Net Users
  • New Users
  • Software
  • Digital Music
  • Gaming World
  • Home Security
  • Apple
  • Networking Hardware
Virus & Spyware
  • Vulnerabilities
  • IDS
  • Encryption
  • Anti-Virus
  • Operating Systems Security
  • Software Firewalls
  • WebApplications
  • Cell Phones
  • Operating Systems
  • Internet
  • Hardware Firewalls
Hardware
  • Handhelds / PDAs
  • Displays / Monitors
  • Components
  • Networking Hardware
  • Peripherals
  • Laptops/Notebooks
  • Storage
  • Servers
  • Desktops
  • New Users
  • Misc
  • Apple
Software
  • System Utilities
  • Industry Specific
  • Network Management
  • Photos / Graphics
  • Page Layout
  • VMWare
  • Misc
  • Web Development
  • OS
  • CYGWIN
  • Voice Recognition
  • Message Queue
  • Quality Assurance
  • Security
  • Firewalls
  • MultiMedia Applications
  • Development
  • Database
  • Office / Productivity
  • Business Management
  • OS/2 Apps
  • Server Software
  • Internet / Email
ITPro
  • OS
  • Storage
  • Encryption
  • Operating Systems Security
  • Apple Hardware
  • Laptops & Notebooks
  • Servers
  • Networking Hardware
  • Peripherals
  • Devices
  • Displays / Monitors
  • WebTrends / Stats
  • Search Engines
  • Firewalls
  • WebApplications
  • IDS
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Email Clients
  • File Sharing
  • Spy / Ad Blockers
  • Web Browsers
  • Web Servers
  • Networking
  • Anti-Virus
  • Chat / IM
  • Anti Spam
Developer
  • Web Servers
  • Web Browsers
  • Game Programming
  • Dev Tools
  • Industry Specific
  • Office / Productivity
  • Database
  • CYGWIN
  • Web Development
  • Search Engines
  • File Sharing
  • WebTrends / Stats
  • Programming
  • Content Management
  • Application Servers
  • Protocols
Storage
  • Removable Backup Media
  • Storage Technology
  • Servers
  • Grid
  • Remote Access
  • Backup / Restore
  • Misc
  • Hard Drives
OS
  • Miscellaneous
  • Security
  • Development
  • Linux
  • VMWare
  • MainFrame OS
  • Unix
  • Apple
  • OS / 2
  • AS / 400
  • BeOS
  • Microsoft
  • VMS / OpenVMS
Database
  • Oracle
  • Miscellaneous
  • MySQL
  • Software
  • Sybase
  • Contact Management
  • PostgreSQL
  • Data Manipulation
  • Clarion
  • InterSystems Cache
  • Siebel
  • MUMPS
  • OLAP
  • SQLBase
  • SAS
  • GIS & GPS
  • 4GL
  • Berkeley DB
  • DB2
  • Informix
  • Interbase / Firebird
  • FoxPro
  • Reporting
  • LDAP
  • Filemaker Pro
  • MS SQL Server
  • dBase
  • MS Access
Security
  • Misc
  • Web Browsers
  • Software Firewalls
  • Operating Systems Security
  • File Sharing
  • Spy / Ad Blockers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • WebApplications
  • IDS
  • Anti-Virus
  • Encryption
  • Anti Spam
  • Email Clients
  • VPN
  • Chat / IM
Programming
  • Editors IDEs
  • Installation
  • Handhelds / PDAs
  • Multimedia Programming
  • System / Kernel
  • Algorithms
  • Game
  • Signal Processing
  • Project Management
  • Open Source
  • Database
  • Misc
  • Languages
  • Processor Platforms
  • Theory
Web Development
  • Scripting
  • Blogs
  • Web Servers
  • Software
  • Search Engines
  • Web Graphics
  • Images
  • Internet Marketing
  • Images and Photos
  • Components
  • Document Imaging
  • Web Languages/Standards
  • Illustration
  • WebApplications
  • Fonts
  • WebTrends / Stats
  • Authoring
  • Digital Camera Software
  • Miscellaneous
Networking
  • Protocols
  • Apple Networking
  • Network Management
  • Message Queue
  • Application Servers
  • Content Management
  • File Servers
  • Email Servers
  • Misc
  • Java Editors & IDEs
  • Wireless
  • Networking Hardware
  • Backup / Restore
  • System Utilities
  • ISPs & Hosting
  • Web Servers
  • Storage Technology
  • Removable Backup Media
  • Servers
  • Broadband
  • Grid
  • OS / 2
  • Novell Netware
  • Unix Networking
  • Windows Networking
  • Security
  • Telecommunications
  • Operating Systems
  • Linux Networking
Other
  • Community Advisor
  • Lounge
  • Community Support
  • New Net Users
  • Philosophy / Religion
  • Math / Science
  • Miscellaneous
  • URLs
  • Expert Lounge
  • Politics
  • Puzzles / Riddles
Community Support
  • Suggestions
  • New to EE
  • New Topics
  • Community Advisor
  • CleanUp
  • Announcements
  • General
  • Feedback
  • Input
  • EE Bugs
 
07.19.2007 at 11:04AM PDT, ID: 19524438

Rank: Genius

I'll try to respond to the other question you e-mailed several of us about later... in the mean time:

I don't/didn't like the wizards because you don't know what they are doing.  You do, but it's like Microsoft saying "sit back and relax, just answer a few questions and we'll take care of everything."  I don't trust the government and I don't trust Microsoft either.  I want to SEE what they are doing.  If the wizards displayed a log or created a clear log that said "creating user account in ad, setting permissions, blah blah blah" in FINE detail, I would feel much better.  I would know, it's doing this, no problem, now that I KNOW what it's doing, I'll trust it to do it later.

That said, there is more than sufficient evidence for me to acknowledge the use of the Wizards, to ensure things are setup in a STANDARD manner that any other semi-literate computer person can pick up where you left off.  When you deviate from best practices, you create complexities that may well be unnecessary and ultimately more costly to the client.

That said, there is ONE wizard I refuse to use.  The backup wizard.  Primarily because the only option is a full backup.    Since tape isn't terribly economical in a small environment - and can be downright temperamental at times - I prefer using disk based backups.  In one case, I have a client who has a 2 GB information store, 1 GB of files, and of course, the system state data.  Growth is nearly non-existent.  So we have them backing up to a DVD using NTBackup and Nero.  One DVD per night - backup takes 30 to 60 minutes and they're done.  Media costs them about $75 per year.  And yes, we've had to do a restore and there was no problem.  But if we had to use the backup built in, the backups would never have fit on a DVD... they might not even fit on an HD DVD or BluRay (not available at the time we setup the system anyway).  Given the options and flexibility of the backup utility itself, I consider it a very unfriendly thing that the wizards REQUIRE full backups each and every time.  Get a client with video or other poorly compressing data and it could run the backup costs into the thousands, requiring a company to purchase a tape drive and tapes that support 400 GB cartridges or a library of some sort - making backup cost more than the server.

Anyway, that's my rant.  And I admit, there are SOME companies where the SBS backup might be fine, but by and large, it unnecessarily increases the costs to a small business.
 
07.19.2007 at 11:27AM PDT, ID: 19524701
"If the wizards displayed a log or created a clear log that said "creating user account in ad, setting permissions, blah blah blah" in FINE detail, I would feel much better"

I've generally discovered... and as you'll read in my comments in the Experts Lounge thread (http:Q_22703460.html), your objection is rooted in a prejudice that has blinded you to the obvious.

EVERY SBS wizard provides a clear log written in plain english.

On the last screen of every SBS Wizard there is a summary of what it's about to do.  For instance the Add User Wizard's last screen might show:

When you click Finish, the wizard will complete the following tasks:

A user account will be created with the following
properties:
      Full name: Lee W
      User logon name: LeeW
      E-mail alias: LeeW
      Home folder: \\SBS\USERS\LeeW

The following template will be applied to this user:
      User Template

The user will be added to the following security groups:
      Remote Web Workplace Users
      Domain Users

The user will be added to the following distribution groups:

      CompanyName

SharePoint access will be configured for the user through
the following site groups:
      Web Designer

The user will have the following disk quota:
      Disk space limited to 1024 MB
      Warning sent at 900 MB


These are automatically saved in C:\Program Files\Microsoft Windows Small Business Server\Support but you can also click the link at the bottom of each wizards last screen which says, "To print, save, or e-mail this information, click here".

Regarding the backup wizard.  Firstly... there is a hack to the backup wizard which will allow incremental backups:
http://sbs.seandaniel.com/2004/10/sbs-2003-backup-hack_05.html

I'm confident that this will be implemented more natively in the next version of SBS.

Regarding your objection to the cost of tape?  I couldn't agree more... and have never implemented a tape drive for any of my SBS deployments.  I only use USB hard drives, and now that these (http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/peripherals/sandisk-unveils-32gb-drop+in-replacement-drive-for-notebooks-225980.php) are available I'm sure that when the price drops to a more affordable range, I'll start using those instead.  Currently, though, I generally deploy three 160GB USB HD's (which run about $120 each) used in rotation.

The primary purpose of a nightly backup is to protect against any disaster and to get a business up and running as quickly and efficiently as possible.  Having posession of a working full backup from the previous day ensures that you can accomplish this.  If the video archive isn't needed to do that, then it should be excluded and an alternative solution should be used for that particular data.

Jeff
TechSoEasy
 
07.24.2007 at 07:38PM PDT, ID: 19562036
I certainly don't have the experience with SBS as many folks here. Most of my work for the last 10 years has been in the enterprise where everything is done manually and usually on different servers. I left the that environment about 3 months ago and have moved to servicing the small business environment where i ran into my first SBS. Not really knowing about the wizards until i saw them on the first server i worked on I did everything manually, the way i am comfortable with. I know what i want done, how to do it and didn't feel the need, mostly because of mis trust of microsoft as previously mentioned. I ended up setting up my own SBS server and didn't use the wizards. Since then, in the last month and a half have read all over this site that terrrible things are going to happen at some point in the future because i didn't use the wizards. So far nothing has happened to my own server or any of the half dozen or so that i have worked on.  

I know my response is not what you are looking for but thought I would add that like leew, i too am not entirely comfortable with microsoft doing things for me and feel that the wizards were designed for those folks that don't really know what they are doing. I know now that everyone says it is critical to use them and in the future i may but I am still very leary about using them and i hope not using them won't actually result in some catastophic failure in the future.
 
07.24.2007 at 08:41PM PDT, ID: 19562470

Rank: Master

I've never had any formal training on the SBS OS but have extensive experience in the enterprise environment. I have set up some SBS servers "by the book" and others the way I thought they should be set up (manually).

Now on to my comment...

I agree with the other users on this post... I don't like the wizards. Most of the time, I want to do LESS than the wizards do (i.e. 3 out of the 10 things). For example: Creating a user that's a member of different groups than the templates, creating a computer account that doesn't install all the software on logon, backing up select data incrementally, etc.

I think I spend more time troubleshooting errors from what the wizard did to my users and computers than I would spend if I didn't run them and did it all manually. Example: trying to figure out why I can't reset the power management scheme on all the computers so they don't go to sleep... I still haven't completely figured that out yet.

Just my 2 cents.
 
07.24.2007 at 09:43PM PDT, ID: 19562735

Rank: Wizard

I don't think it is as black and white as this Jeff - I have never installed SBS without at least 1 wizard - the CEICW to kick off.  After that, I generally don't use them at all.  I have a few tiny sites of <5 users where I have walked the full path of the wizard, but to be honest, I don't think it made much difference in the end.

If I had time, I would build some test SBS networks and watch, but honestly, i would rather focus on Exchange 2007 or Windows 2008 - which is going to probably just prove that SBS isn't something that I am terribly interested in, I just see it as a cheaper way to get licensing, like it used to be.

Of course, I do still agree with our previous discussion, all SBS systems should be using all the wizards, all the time.  I just don't think that applies to MY networks :)

-red
 
07.25.2007 at 07:53AM PDT, ID: 19565925

Rank: Genius

Single NIC installations where I have an upstream proxy/firewall cause problems in themselves.  You need to really bypass CEICW and ignore the nags about not being complete - not clean IMHO.  I have it running in my lab on a VM and it works fine, but I continue to get nagged about running this wizard even though there is no option for my configuration.

Other than that, the wizards do a lot of the dirty work for you and rarely make a mistake.  Since so much of SBS depends on exact configuration of assets and the corresponding assumptions of the locations of things (like the default OU structure), unless you configure things in the right order and correctly then all sorts of things don't work as expected.

DHCP also comes to mind.  If I don't want SBS to manage DHCP you don't really have the option with the wizards - you have to disable it afterwards.

I'm not sure what you're moving towards on this question - it's simply not a good idea to bypass the wizards unless you know exactly what you are doing and have a specific case to do so.  Many server guys like myself prefer to do things manually, but realize that's not in the best interest of a proper installation.

I think the wizards need a few more options to be 100% effective for all scenarios.

Just my opinions.
 
07.27.2007 at 05:37PM PDT, ID: 19583162
I have setup dozens on SBS servers in the past year alone and to be honest I have mixed feelings about the wizards.  On one hand they make it quick and simple, but on the other it can cause a LOT of headaches down the road.  Here are the 2 most annoying/troublesome aspects of the wizards (IMHO):

1.  DHCP...It sets the scope range to be your ENTIRE subnet (i.e. 192.168.1.1-255) then puts in exclusions.  This is quite possibly the worst way of doing a DHCP scope.
2.  Firewall GPO...I always have to go back and disable the firewall on all machines because the Wizard creates this Firewall GPO.  This especially becomes annoying when installing a server based AV system that pushes out installs over WMI (which needs the Firewall disabled).

I do use a lot of the wizards because in most cases everything works fine (I only have to go back and change 3 or 4 things that it did).  I agree with Netman, they need to have a Standard and an Advanced mode for their wizards, and have it ask you at the beginning of the install which method you want.  This way people like me could better control the Wizards functions (I.E. tell it the CORRECT DHCP Scope options)

Thanks,
Dan
 
07.30.2007 at 05:28AM PDT, ID: 19591890

Rank: Master

Is it Heseltine?
 
07.31.2007 at 10:01PM PDT, ID: 19606364
I thank those that have posted and I do plan on responding to each comment.

The term "Heseltine" isn't familiar to me, but I'm guessing it's a reference to a "one-size-fits-all" solution?

Jeff
TechSoEasy
 
08.02.2007 at 08:51AM PDT, ID: 19618127

Rank: Master

No, Heseltine is often the solution to BigRat's riddles and you have posted this in Puzzles and Riddles. Didn't realise you had it in a tech area as well.

I would say use the wizards simply because it has then been done 'by the book' and so is easier for the next person to maintain because it has MS standard settings rather than your customisation.
 
08.02.2007 at 09:08AM PDT, ID: 19618300

Rank: Genius

I agree - because a good and ethical consultant (in my opinion) will do things in a manner that makes it possible for the next consultant/admin to take over easily, you want to follow whatever the best practices/recommendations are for a given setup.  In SBS, that means using the Wizards.  Regardless of what YOU may be more comfortable with.  And any deviations need to be appropriately documented and left with the client.
Accepted Solution
 
08.02.2007 at 02:23PM PDT, ID: 19621020

Rank: Wizard

 
08.27.2007 at 05:41AM PDT, ID: 19775034

Rank: Guru

Jeff:

To add to leew's comment to learning the roots of the sytem insead of hiding it behind a wizard.

I went through school learning math without a calculator. I see folks today who use calculators all the time. It takes them much more time to learn then if they have to manually calculate this out.

Anyone who says they know everything there is to know about computers, is just lying.

I like hearing advice from folks who are more knowledgeable than I am with computers while looking at the grass roots of the system. I learn better and quicker that way.

I also like hearing about comments like yours because if I don't, I can't keep myself in check when I try to help others out.

Thanks,

John
 
10.12.2007 at 02:12AM PDT, ID: 20063905
Sorry for the delay in responding... I had a number of these comments written a few weeks
ago, but never got around to summing them up.  
Each of you responded with a "scenario" where you thought the wizards don't work
but I didn't see any examples of my core question, which was:


          "What situations have you found that they prevent you from implementing a customized
          solution?" or "What situations have you found that the wizards do something you don't
          want them to do and your only option is to not run them (ie, the wizard makes 10
          settings and you like 7 of them but don't like 3)?
         
So, the best I can do is to give direct feedback to a few notable comments:


"the last month and a half have read all over this site that terrible things
are going to happen at some point in the future because i didn't use the
wizards. So far nothing has happened to my own server or any of the half dozen
or so that i have worked on."

          I think you're looking at this from the wrong end of the equation.  I don't
          think anyone said that terrible things are going to happen if you don't use the
          wizards.  The basic question I posed above is that given that it takes a
          significant amount of time to manually configure things compared to the wizards,
          why would you do something that takes so much longer?  And while I don't want to
          suggest that you are guilty of this, I am aware of a number of consultants who
          charge by the hour -- so if they are doing things manually, they are ultimately
          being unethical towards their clients.  
         
          But it's actually more than just how much is being billed out to a client.
          Consider that there are some features of SBS which you may not be aware of which
          could save your clients significant amounts of time and money if they took
          advantage of these benefits which are part of SBS natively.  Most of the
          features are installed and configured automatically when the wizards are used...
          but when the wizards aren't used, the features go unused.  The priorities of
          what features are imporatant are different for every client, but if they aren't
          even aware of what some of them are, such as centralized fax, Exchange deleted
          item recovery, Volume Shadow Snapshot file recovery, Intelligent Message Filter
          for reducing SPAM, Document libraries that are easier to manage, automatic
          backup of My Documents folders, remote access to their office desktops, full
          synchronization with their windows mobile smartphone or PDA, daily, easy to
          understand monitoring reports to let them know the health of their system so
          they don't worry as much... All of these things (among others) are installed and
          configured automatically through just the wizards listed in the To-Do list of
          the Server Management Console.
         
          You may know what you want done... but you've admitted to not having any
          experience in the Small Business realm... perhaps you should find out what Small
          Business owners want?  (and you can't just ask them... because they don't know
          the answers to the "direct" questions about technology... instead you have to
          keep abreast of the multitude of studies and surveys which interpret the views
          of small business: http://snipr.com/1qrn2  (then ignore at least half of those
          and make up your own predictions... but make sure that whatever you do, you
          aren't using your "enterprise network" mentality because that is never in step
          with what small business owners want).

"I think I spend more time troubleshooting errors from what the wizard did to my
users and computers than I would spend if I didn't run them and did it all
manually. Example: trying to figure out why I can't reset the power management
scheme on all the computers so they don't go to sleep... I still haven't
completely figured that out yet."

          I will cover this a bit more down below... but suffice it to say that if you are
          troubleshooting errors from the wizards, you haven't learned how to properly
          install and configure an SBS.  While I sometimes run into errors when running
          the wizards, they are easily found and corrected.  Usually it's something that I
          just forgot to do, like plug in an ethernet cable, and if I didn't have the
          wizard to remind me, it might have been missed overall and caused a need even
          greater troubleshooting.
         
          As for the power management on workstations?  It can't be managed by group
          policy on Windows XP... it has nothing to do with SBS at all.  But you can
          download a third party tool called EZ GPO to help you with this:
          http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=power_mgt.pr_pm_ez_gpo.  Vista does
          support power management through group policy... and there is also a nice
          Wake-on-LAN plugin for Remote Web Workplace for XP Machines.  You can read about
          both of those things here:
          http://sbs.seandaniel.com/2007/03/interesting-in-conserving-little-power.html

"Single NIC installations where I have an upstream proxy/firewall cause problems
in themselves.  You need to really bypass CEICW and ignore the nags about not
being complete - not clean IMHO.  I have it running in my lab on a VM and it
works fine, but I continue to get nagged about running this wizard even though
there is no option for my configuration."

          What do you mean there is no option for your configuration???  Single NIC with a
          FIREWALL is absolutely supported and documented.  Even if it's a PROXY (because
          you would set all local traffic to bypass the proxy). You most definitely do not
          have to bypass the CEICW, nor should you. See configuration option number 5 or 6
          at http://sbsurl.com/msicw.  I've deployed MANY SBS networks with this
          configuration... primarily using SonicWall Firewalls


"1.  DHCP...It sets the scope range to be your ENTIRE subnet (i.e.
192.168.1.1-255) then puts in exclusions.  This is quite possibly the worst way
of doing a DHCP scope."

          Why would that be the worst way of doing a DHCP scope?  A default installation
          of SBS would create a scope range of 192.168.16.1-254, then exclude
          192.168.16.1- 10 and when you then run the Remote Access Configuration Wizard,
          it will grab 192.168.16.11 - 19 for RRAS connections.  I will often go back and
          then exclude 192.168.16.200-254 to use for printers and other such devices, but
          perhaps you can explain what a better method would be?


"2.  Firewall GPO...I always have to go back and disable the firewall on all
machines because the Wizard creates this Firewall GPO.  This especially becomes
annoying when installing a server based AV system that pushes out installs over
WMI (which needs the Firewall disabled)."

          If you have to go back and disable the firewall on all machines, then you aren't
          really allowing SBS to manage the network centrally.  I've run many programs
          that use WMI to push out a client program and the only time I've ever seen a
          problem is when I came into a network that the workstations weren't joined using
          the ConnectComputer wizard.  If you are not joining the workstations to the
          domain using http://<servername>/connectcomputer, then the permissions may not
          be getting set correctly to allow access via WMI.  Then, that problem is being
          compensated for by disabling the Windows Firewall which unnecessarily weakens
          the security of the network.

          ** I would note that there is a small issue with the WMI Provider when joining a
          Vista Client to an SBS Domain, but that's been fully covered by this KB article
          & Patch:  http://support.microsoft.com/kb/926505

"I agree with Netman, they need to have a Standard and an Advanced mode for
their wizards, and have it ask you at the beginning of the install which method
you want.  This way people like me could better control the Wizards functions
(I.E. tell it the CORRECT DHCP Scope options)"

          In my opinion, if you are a more advanced user you should understand that
          because there are so many different things running concurrently in SBS, it is
          even more important to make sure that all these parts are carefully synchronized
          so you don't spend hours upon hours troubleshooting some problem that could have
          been avoided if you used the wizard to simultaneously configure all the parts.
          The additional benefit is that if you can be much more confident that making a
          small modification to one part of the network won't create a conflict with
          another.
         
          Let's say, for instance, that you needed to change the server's local IP address
          so that it doesn't conflict with a new VOIP system (this has happened to me a
          couple of times -- some of those VOIP folks like their IP addresses to be set
          their way and I didn't really want or need to argue with them).  Normally, on a
          stand-alone network that had all that SBS is running you'd have to change
          settings in at least eight different places (including rewriting dozens of ISA
          rules) and then hope you got them all while you watched the event logs for
          errors and ran diags.  With SBS, it's as simple as running the Change Server IP
          Address Wizard which will take care of everything.
          (See:  http://techsoeasy.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!AB2725BC5698FCB8!303.entry for
          details).
          Basically a task that could otherwise take half a day is accomplished in 5
          minutes.

"I would say use the wizards simply because it has then been done 'by the book'
and so is easier for the next person to maintain because it has MS standard
settings rather than your customisation."

          andyalder, who I think stumbled upon this thread by accident, has provided the
          most brilliant answer of all (http:#19618127 -- which leew and red were quick to recognize).  
          This whole notion of "not trusting Microsoft" (leew you are such a flip-flopper on
          this) is really hogwash.  You don't have to trust Microsoft or anyone when you
          use the wizards.  I've already demonstrated that they are wholey
          transparant...you just need to read what's on your screen to see that.  And the
          wizards along with SBS's default configuration was not just "decided upon" by
          some Microsoft project manager.  The process was guided by the input from the
          entire SBS development team, over 50 SBS MVP's, hundreds of beta testers and now
          tens of thousands of successful implementations are proving that it works in
          most every instance.  I know for sure that even though I've installed and
          configured over 100 SBS networks to date, that I certainly believe that I know
          better than all these folks.  I absolutely know enough at this point to question
          the process though... and I do that regularly.  However, since the vast majority
          of my career life has not been spent in IT Consulting, but like most of my
          clients I was running a small business, so my perspective remains from the view
          of the business owner who doesn't spend $10,000 or $15,000 very often and wants
          to make sure that he gets the BEST possible value for the money... not just
          today, but for the life of the asset.
         
          One small business I was involved with for over 10 years was my family's fine
          dining restaurant in Arizona.  We had a rich history that spanned over 50 years
          with three generations of family involvement.  During my time there, the
          restaurant earned the Mobil Travel Guide Five-Star Award and the AAA
          Five-Diamond Award for many consecutive years.  Usually, when you think of
          Five-Star Restaurants, you think of a charismatic chef who produces masterful
          creations and is perhaps the "star" of the establishment.  But our family had a
          philosophy that if a single person created recipes that only a select few could
          produce, we would just be another one of those popular places that disappears
          after a few months or a couple of years.  Instead, because we had a recipe book
          that was managed by my Aunt in consultation with the chef, Maitre d', and the
          rest of the management team, which could be produced consistently to high
          standards by any number of our kitchen staff, our restaurant maintained the
          position of being the highest rated restaurant in Arizona for almost 40 years.
          Although it is no longer there today (due to urban development), it is still
          thought of as "the best that ever was".
         
          I tell that story because I think it says a lot about my committment to
          consistency, which most of you feel probably doesn't exist in the IT world. I can
          tell you that the food world is no different... maintaining a level of unfailing
          quality that your customers can count on requires keeping the your efforts well
          rooted in the foundation of what's proven to work so that you can build upon
          success.  Then, when you take a chance or two with something new and different
          (SharePoint Services, or a CRM implementation), your customers will be right
          there with you instead of second guessing every suggestion you make.
         
          Furthermore, I'd point out that while I don't quite understand the context that
          ChiefIT's comment "Anyone who says they know everything there is to know about
          computers, is just lying" was aimed towards, I can't help but think that anyone
          who chooses to ignore the wizards falls into the category of those who think they
          know everything.


"I like hearing advice from folks who are more knowledgeable than I am with
computers while looking at the grass roots of the system. I learn better and
quicker that way."

          Of course every project we undertake is ultimately a learning experience,
          but learning is not the primary objective when deploying a Server and complete
          network infrastructure for a paying client.  That's something you need to do on
          your own time with your own test installations.  When you do that, you will find
          that the wizards don't hide anything.  Everything is spelled out VERY CLEARLY on
          both the first page (which tells you what it's going to do) and the last page
          which provides you the EXACT details of what it's doing.  If you like, you can
          print out that last page, quit the wizard and then make the entries manually if
          that helps you understand it better.  But when deploying an SBS for a paying
          client who expects the product to deliver everything it claims, the server
          should be installed and configured in the quickest method possible to provide
          all features that will benefit the organization including it's low, long-term
          management costs.
         

Let me also add...

Every time a wizard is run, a complete log of it's actions is created in
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Windows Small Business Server\Support
I highly recommend that you poke around in the C:\Program Files\Microsoft Windows Small Business Server
directory to see what else is there.  In doing so, you'll find that every time the CEICW is run
it creates both a full outline of what its doing, plus it creates a .vbs file of its settings
in case you need to revert back to a previous setting.  (You'll find that in
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Windows Small Business Server\Networking\ICW)

I welcome any comments or feedback before I close out this question.

Jeff
TechSoEasy

 
10.12.2007 at 02:29AM PDT, ID: 20063971

Rank: Master

> I will often go back and then exclude 192.168.16.200-254 to use for printers and other such devices, but perhaps you can explain what a better method would be?

It's better to reserve DHCP addresses for the printers by MAC address than exclude a range, then the printers are automatically documented by being listed there.

BTW, it was indeed by accident that I ended up in this thread by dint of you posting it in Puzzles and Riddles. We stopped supporting SBS in the SBS 4.5 days and only do big corporates nowadays; want to but an 8TB 15,000 user Exchange server?
 
10.12.2007 at 02:42AM PDT, ID: 20064017
"It's better to reserve DHCP addresses for the printers by MAC address than exclude a range, then the printers are automatically documented by being listed there."

Those two things aren't mutually exclusive... I always use DHCP Reservations for Printers --- but I use IP addresses that are in an Excluded Range.

Jeff
TechSoEasy
 
 
11.30.2007 at 01:54AM PST, ID: 20380692
WTF answering your own question, that's out of order.
 
 
11.30.2007 at 07:42AM PST, ID: 20382746
It just seemed easier than requesting that the question be PAQ/Refund since nobody truly answered my question.  The end result is the same though.