Advertisement

03.23.2007 at 03:33AM PDT, ID: 22467843
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

9.2

Microsoft Virtual Server. Should I run host as Windows 2003 Enteprise w/ SP2 OR 2003 R2 Enterprise

Asked by impire in Microsoft Server, Windows 2003 Server

Tags: , , , ,

Greetings,

This question is related to Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 Enterprise.  But since it is relevant to the OS, I am posting it here.

I am running Windows 2003 Enterprise SP2 on the host server.  On the virtual instances, I installed several Windows 2003 Enterprise R2 VHD.   I am thinking of upgrading my HOST server to Window 2003 Enterprise R2.  I thought this would keep my host and the more VMs syncronized.  My quetions are:

1) If I don't upgrade and leave the host with the Windows 2003 , will this cause a compatibility issue since the host is R2 and the VMs are not?

2) Will I  gain any real benefit by upgrading the host to R2?  Will it give me any better performance?

I read the comparision between the R2 and the Enterprise SP2 version and it only have the few diffences.  The differences were mostly Active Directory and File Syncronization.  

I really don't want to upgrade because it's a real pain to reload 264 servers.  I am just wondering if there's a real reason to upgrade or not upgrade.  Although this question may seems simple, it is yet a very important question for me and may save me from the misery of upgrading (aka... there goes my vacation time).  Thanks for your help.
--
Regards,

AndyStart Free Trial
[+][-]03.23.2007 at 04:46AM PDT, ID: 18778821

Assisted solutions are selected by the member who asked the question as a comment that contributed to their question's solution.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Assisted Solution or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]03.23.2007 at 06:52AM PDT, ID: 18779664

View this solution now by starting your 7-day free trial. Setting up your free trial is quick, easy, and secure. We will return you to this solution, unlocked, when you're done.

 

About this solution

Zones: Microsoft Server, Windows 2003 Server
Tags: server, 2003, virtual, microsoft, enterprise
Sign Up Now!
Solution Provided By: oBdA
Participating Experts: 2
Solution Grade: A
 
 
[+][-]03.24.2007 at 10:27PM PDT, ID: 18787398

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 7-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
 
Loading Advertisement...
20080716-EE-VQP-32