Advertisement

08.29.2008 at 06:34PM PDT, ID: 23690480
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

9.1

"The specified network name is no longer available", frequently and for no obvious reason...

Asked by andrewa42 in Virtual Private Networking (VPN), Windows XP Operating System, Microsoft Server

Tags: , , ,

This is a three site network which was previously *very* stable (but s.l.o.w.) using vpn over cablemodem. We recently changed to an embarq "fast ether" connection, it is 50mb sync. fiber. Nothing else was changed (beyond routing & firewall rules). Two remote sites connect to the central site which hosts storage and the database server.

I'm not certain any of this is relevent, but here it is anyway:
All three sites are using soekris net4801 running:  m0n0wall 1.22 (central), pfSense 1.2 (remotes)
old_remote_site has all stations as part of an independant domain (old_domain_2)
new_remote_site has all stations as part of the central_site domain (central_domain)
all sites are in their own /24 address spaces.
all three (fiber) gateways are in their own /24 address space (192.168.88.0).
I can ping any address at old_remote_site from database_server (at central_site).
I can ping by name database_server from any station at old_remote_site.
tracert from either end shows the expected output.
everything I've looked at says MTU 1500. Embarq says I can use jumbo packets if I want.

The issue is this: when users at old_remote_site scan documents or take xrays (dental office), they get message to the effect that the file cannot be created, usually accompanied by the "delayed write failure" message in the tray. If I attempt a file copy, I get at a random point in the copy "network name no longer available".  "net use" at the command prompt tells me the drive is disconnected. but it will reconnect if I change to that drive. If I then change back to drive c:, the status *immediately* changes to "disconnected".

It may be relevent to note that the database client program (which uses sql over tcp/ip) is completely unaffected by all this...only my mapped drives/file shares die.

What I really don't understand is that this all worked perfectly over the VPNs, and I didn't change any domains, users, login scripts, dns servers, client gateways, or anything else except for the routing on the m0n0wall/pfSense boxes.
Start Free Trial
 
Loading Advertisement...
 
[+][-]08.29.2008 at 11:19PM PDT, ID: 22350856

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 30-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]08.30.2008 at 12:55AM PDT, ID: 22351027

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 30-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]08.30.2008 at 07:41AM PDT, ID: 22352119

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 30-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]08.30.2008 at 07:44AM PDT, ID: 22352126

At Experts Exchange, members can ask their questions to thousands of technology professionals, also known as Experts. Experts compete and collaborate to answer those questions by leaving comments like this one.

Start your 30-day free trial to view this Expert Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]08.30.2008 at 06:25PM PDT, ID: 22353785

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 30-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
[+][-]08.31.2008 at 12:08AM PDT, ID: 22354250

View this solution now by starting your 30-day free trial. Setting up your free trial is quick, easy, and secure. We will return you to this solution, unlocked, when you're done.

 

About this solution

Zones: Virtual Private Networking (VPN), Windows XP Operating System, Microsoft Server
Tags: Microsoft, Windows, XP SP2/2003 SP1, metro vlan connection
Sign Up Now!
Solution Provided By: dave4dl
Participating Experts: 1
Solution Grade: A
 
 
 
Loading Advertisement...
20081112-EE-VQP-44 / EE_QW_2_20070628