i have tried this and eventually one or other did complain and shutdown system services and everyone connected was disconnected at random, new connections were blocked.
i now run the secondary domain behind an internal router to seperated them but this negates the ability to have them on the same logical ip subnet.
two sbs servers cannot co-exist on the same physical subnet except for the limited migration period after which the servers will cease to function. (they will "fight" each other)
the idea of using a cheap sbs platform as a secondary server is tempting but is fraught with issues in this situation. currently the site i have 2 sbs servers is for two logical groups working totally independantly of each other.
Main Topics
Browse All Topics





by: ekim10Posted on 2008-11-16 at 21:32:26ID: 22973487
I have setup 2 SBS 2003 servers on one network subnet with no problems (it was two separate companies that needed to access each others data) but they have to be two different domains. Though it is possible it is not recommended. You wont be able to attached one computer to both domains - but if you manually setup the exactly same user accounts on both servers the workstations should be able to access them.
As soon as you start to use more than one server for the same network you will have a much easier time managing it if you use standard edition servers. You could use the SBS 2003 transition pack to convert your current SBS server to standard edition and then add in another 2003 standard server.