|
[x]
Posted via EE Mobile
|
|
| Search, ask, and monitor your questions on the go with EE Mobile. Visit Experts Exchange from your mobile device and never be out of touch again. |
|
|
|
|
|
[x]
The Solution Rating System
|
|
| With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating. - The Grade of the Solution
- The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
- The Number of Author and Expert Comments
- The Number of Experts Contributing
- The Feedback of the Community
Your Input Matters Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site. If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support. Thank you! |
|
|
|
|
Asked by jcistaro in SBS Small Business Server, Windows Server 2008, Windows Network Security
I am in the proposal stages of designing a small network. I have proposed two servers...One SBS 2003 STD server and one 2008 server. I had intended to have the second server there idle as a disaster to maintina the AD informatino in the event of a failure of server one. I got the following reply from the clients advisor. Can you counter this? I obviously want to sell two servers, but if I am wrong, then I am wrong.
In this environment I see no advantage gained by the backup server. While this server would keep the "network" running, there would be no data to access, because it would all reside on the primary server. Therefore to the end user, this server would do nothing. Current windows clients will cache the domain sign on data, so unlike in the past, you would still have full access to your local P.C. While there are ways to make the secondary server a true fall-back for the primary server, this would require both servers to have IDENTICAL hardware configurations, and use a different version of windows server (Windows Server 2008 enterprise). This would be substantially more expensive and I am not sure that level of redundancy is justified in this environment.
20091028-EE-VQP-88 - Hierarchy / EE_QW_3_20080625