[x]
Posted via EE Mobile

Search, ask, and monitor your questions on the go with EE Mobile. Visit Experts Exchange from your mobile device and never be out of touch again.

Question
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

6.4

Configuring Microsoft Server 2008 and Domain for Use as a Software Router with Ipv4 and Ipv6 Functionality

Asked by NoxBestia in Windows Server 2008, Windows Networking, TCP/IP

Tags: ipv6, rras, Server 2008, dhcpv6, router, Microsoft

Greetings;

First, I shall give you a summary of what I am trying to accomplish, followed by more in-depth information below.  Please let me know how I can help you to help me and I will do my best.  Hopefully this wont end up being another one of my unanswerable questions.  I also hope that I have not provided too much information and confused things. :)

GOAL: Server 2008-based Domain LAN (running in Server 2003 compatibility level) configured so that when a workstation is joined to the domain it will have the following:
     "      A non-routable IPv4 address (in the 10.x.x.x range)
     "      A routable IPv6 address
     "      Ability to access IPv6 enabled Internet sites via Internet Explorer 7 and show as accessing via IPv6 rather than IPv4.  (Example: http://www.ipv6.org/ will indicate if you are using IPv4 or IPv6.)
     "      The ability to access the workstation directly from the Internet via IPv6 rather than having to go through NAT
     "      **OPTIONAL**: it would be nice to be able to configure some servers or workstations with IPv6 ONLY.

NETWORKING HARDWARE:
     "      WAN Access to shared T1 via Cisco 1700 Series router.  NOTE: this device is owned and operated by XO communications and outside of my control.  We have a range of 30 IPv4 addresses via this switch, the majority of them already in use by the in-production domain.
     "      Simple 5-port switch for sharing the WAN between the production domain, the R&D department, and the new domain (this project)
     "      Host Server for virtual servers with multiple NICs.  This box is running Server 2008 Enterprise 64-bit with Hyper-V configured for Virtual Guest Servers and Virtual Networks as needed

ASSUMPTIONS:
     "      XO communications does not have Global IPv6 addresses for us
     "      Assuming that my understanding of IPv6 Link Local addressing is correct and that these are non-routable addresses, that it would then be preferred to assign internal IPv6 addresses via DHCPv6 reservations and not rely on the IPv6 link local addressing
     "      My interpretation of Understanding IPv6 Second Edition (page 365) indicates that the creation and automatic assignment of pseudorandom unique local address is optional but advised.

FIRST ATTEMPT (FAILED): The following describes the configuration that I _tried_ on my initial attempts to get this working.  It went through various modifications.  The following is where I left it last night and what I am facing today.  NOTE: the current configuration DOES NOT work for IPv4 or IPv6 due to failed attempts at getting both to work last night.
     "      On my Virtual Host server I have allocated 2 NICs for the project.  
                    o      One is connected to the WAN by way of XOs Cisco 1700 router.  It has a static IPv4 address from our range.
                    o      The second NIC has a direct connection to an extra NIC in my workstation (also running Server 2008 with Hyper-V) for increased ease of access to the new virtual domain.  
"      VIRTUAL GUEST SERVERS:  For the purposes of this configuration all virtual servers are running Server 2008 64-bit.
                    o      GPB-VWDS is the domain controller for the new domain.  It has the following roles: AD DS, DNS, and Windows Deployment Services (unrelated to this project)
                    o      GPB-VRRAS is my routing server.  It has the following roles: RRAS, DHCP
                    o      GPB-VWSUS is being used as a client for this test (but it was built as a WSUS and KMS server).  It has the following roles: AD CS, IIS, WSUS, KMS
"      IP ADDRESSING:
                    o      GPB-PRIME (the virtual host server) has two NICs allocated for this project.  They are configured as follows:
                                   §      WAN: a static IPv4 address of 205.158.120.200, subnet mask of 255.555.255.224, gateway of 205.158.120.193, and no DNS.  It has automatic IPV6 configuration enabled which gives it an FE80-based link local address and three DNS servers: FEC0:0:0:FFFF::1, FEC0:0:0:FFFF::2, and FEC0:0:0:FFFF::2
                                   §      LAN: a static IPv4 of 10.7.7.5, no gateway, no DNS.  NOTE: it is not a member of the new domain due to membership and other functions in the old domain.
                                   §      Other NICs not in use for this project are not listed.
                    o      SGT-JRICE (my workstation) has a NIC allocated for this project with a static IPv4 of 10.7.7.6, no gateway, no DNS.  It does not have IPv6 capabilities activated on it.  Other NICs not in use for this project are not listed.  NOTE: this machine is not a member of the new domain due to its uses in the production domain.
                    o      GPB-VWDS has a static IPv4 of 10.7.7.250, gateway of 10.7.7.254, and DNS of 10.7.7.250.  It has a statically assigned IPv6 address of FCBE:DEAD:DEAD::A07:7FA, no gateway, and DNS of ::1
                    o      GPB-RRAS has two NICs attached to the appropriate virtual networks on GPB-PRIME.  They are configured as follows:
                                   §      WAN: a static IPv4 address of 205.158.120.202, subnet mask of 255.555.255.224, gateway of 205.158.120.193, and DNS of 10.7.7.250.  It does not offer IPv6.
                                   §      LAN: a static IPv4 of 10.7.7.254, no gateway, DNS of 10.7.7.250.  RRAS is configured on this machine and works as far as IPv4 is concerned.
                    o      GPB-WSUS has a dynamic IPv4 reservation for 10.7.7.30.  It is not getting an IPv6 address from GPB-RRAS but it does have its FE80 link local IPv6 address.
     "      It should be noted that the DNS server has both A and AAAA records for machines with statically configured IPv6 addresses, but does not list AAAA records for any of the FE80 link local connections.
     "      I have three reverse lookup zones configured: 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.8.e.f.ip6.arpa, 0.0.0.0.d.a.e.d.d.a.e.d.e.b.c.f.ip6.arpa, and 7.7.10.in-addr.arpa

I am sure that I have done numerous things quite wrong and perhaps even some of my assumptions are incorrect.  I am hoping for some useful feedback so that I do not waste as much time blundering through this.  At this time I do not have a budget for purchasing any additional hardware or services; I have to make do with what I have described above.

Thank you for any attempt you make at understanding and helping me with this.

Johnny-dog Duane Rice
Senior Technology Officer
Gamma Phi Beta Sorority
jrice@gammaphibeta.org

[+][-]03/25/09 12:30 PM, ID: 23983627Accepted Solution

View this solution now by starting your 30-day free trial. Setting up your free trial is quick, easy, and secure. We will return you to this solution, unlocked, when you're done.

About this solution

Zones: Windows Server 2008, Windows Networking, TCP/IP
Tags: ipv6, rras, Server 2008, dhcpv6, router, Microsoft
Sign Up Now!
Solution Provided By: NoxBestia
Participating Experts: 1
Solution Grade: A
 
 
Loading Advertisement...
20091021-EE-VQP-81 - Hierarchy / EE_QW_Related_20080208