[x]
Posted via EE Mobile

Search, ask, and monitor your questions on the go with EE Mobile. Visit Experts Exchange from your mobile device and never be out of touch again.

04/27/2000 at 02:57PM PDT, ID: 10335253
[x]
Attachment Details
[x]
The Solution Rating System

With so many solutions, how can you tell which solutions are most likely to help you and which ones are not? To provide you with a tool to use, we rate our solutions based on various elements that most accurately determine if a solution is a quality solution. To explain what factors affect the solution rating, here are the elements we take into consideration when formulating our solution rating.

  • The Grade of the Solution
  • The Zone Rank of the Expert Providing the Solution
  • The Number of Author and Expert Comments
  • The Number of Experts Contributing
  • The Feedback of the Community

Your Input Matters
Because of the way the system is set up, the most important variable in this equation is you. As a member of Experts Exchange, you are able to cast your vote on the quality of the solutions in regard to how complete, accurate, helpful and easy to understand each solution is. When you provide your feedback, each rating is adjusted accordingly. So, if you see a solution that has a poor rating that you think is a good solution, let us know by rating it. As you do, the rating will be adjusted and will become more accurate for other members of our site.

If you have any suggestions that you would like to make for our rating system, please ask a question in the Suggestions Zone of Community Support.

Thank you!

8.0

Task Manager (memory)

Asked by conick in Windows 2000 Operating System

Tags: commit, manager, memory, task

Ive been messing around with the Task Manager, and I have a couple questions about what it displays.  Particularly, the performance tab.

The memory usage graph seems to be displaying the "commit memory".  When I normally think of memory I think "physical memory."
I have a NT4.0 workstation and a W2K workstation.
Both have 64M RAM (as I traditionally think of memory)
Here is the breakdown: (I'll apologize in advance for the formatting)
OS     Physical     Kernel     Commit

NT     64940K     24128K     131400K
2K     65074K     19116K     101196K

My question is what is the difference between the three?  Why does task manager show Commit instead of Physical in the graph (ie is it more important?)?  Why does my NT workstation have so much more commit memory than the NT?
I really should know this stuff :(

Any help would be appreciated.
I'll add more points for exceptional answers.
Thanks
[+][-]04/27/00 08:48 PM, ID: 2758030

View this solution now by starting your 30-day free trial. Setting up your free trial is quick, easy, and secure. We will return you to this solution, unlocked, when you're done.

 

About this solution

Zone: Windows 2000 Operating System
Tags: commit, manager, memory, task
Sign Up Now!
Solution Provided By: huben
Participating Experts: 1
Solution Grade: A
 
 
[+][-]04/28/00 06:20 AM, ID: 2759204

Often, when Experts are collaborating with members who have asked questions, they will request additional information about the problem. Askers respond with an author comment like this one.

Start your 30-day free trial to view this Author Comment or ask the Experts your question.

 
 
Loading Advertisement...
20091028-EE-VQP-88