For the record - my user - and the group administrators are already owners of the folder(s) in question.
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsI am using windows vista business - installed at the factory by the PC manufacturer.
I have a single user account which is configured as administrator.
I am logged in on that account.
In windows vista many sub-directories are listed as "read only" (such as anything under program files - and surprisingly - most folders under c:\users\{USER}) and even as administrator vista will not let me change this attribute.
(** on a side note: I also noticed that legacy programs that try to save files to their home directories in program files will end up saving their files to a "virtualstore" which is inconveniently nestled away in C:\Users\{USER}\AppData\Lo
I have the following directory:
C:\Users\Public\Documents\
This directory is also set to read only.
I changed the security permissions on this folder to allow everyone (including all users and systems listed under the security tab) to full control of this directory.
Now, If I attempt to remove the check from the read-only checkbox in the properties dialog box for said directory - windows vista accepts the changes without error when I hit okay.. However, the next time I open the properties for this folder - windows vista has re-checked the read only checkbox. This seems to be the case for pretty much any directory under c:\Users in which I attempt to remove the read only attribute.
I have searched around the net - and have found no acceptable solutions to this issue yet. I did read some mumbings about removing the read only flag (which seems to be set by default) from the system root, however, upon consideration, this seemed to be a bit rash, given the possible system wide security impact.
Also - I am not running any 3rd party system software, such as anything with a Symantec label on it. (I quickly removed their pre-installed suite from my new machine as soon as I unwrapped the tower from the box.)
You'd think that if it were against the user or group policies to change this attribute - that vista would throw an error at me, considering I am the administrator, right? - rather than just quietly re-enabling the read only attribute after i have closed the properties dialog box.. I'm starting to think that M$ should have borrowed the sega dreamcast's slogan from a few years back and changed it to -
Microsoft Windows Vista - "Its thinking... for you."
I appreciate your kind consideration and tolerence for my sarcasm on this issue - and I hope someone has some genuine insight into the background of how this security system works and why it would apparently overrule my decision to remove the attribute.
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
http://support.microsoft.c
The article is not written for Vista, but the same principle applies.
The bottom line is the Read-Only flag in on folders means nothing, and changing it in Windows Explorer does absolutely nothing, which is as it should be according to Microsoft. It does not actually make the folder Read only, you can still delete folders, files, etc. because Windows itself ignores that flag. It's been that for the last few versions of Windows. Read the Microsoft article. If you actually need to change it due to a program having a problem with it, use attrib from the command line as the article states.
After reading the article, its clear that this perticular caviat of windows is some sort of a work around Microsoft implemented quite a while ago. While on its surface, the functionality is very misleading because the read-only attribute doesn't DO what it implies in this case. Follow that up with the fact that there is no dialog displayed about this functionality when you do try to change it and I feel that is it just down right sloppy implementation on microsoft's part.
However, I'm sure that it is nieve for me to assume that this wasn't a logical implementation, because I'm I still don't understand the entire reasoning for why they did it this way.
Frustrating that I lost as much time screwing around with this as I did.
Thanks for your insightfulness. Always something more to learn!
Hehe, I have no idea why MS did this either. From the article...
"When a folder has the Read-Only attribute set it causes Explorer to request the Desktop.ini of that folder to see if any special folder settings need to be set."
To me that means, hey we're lazy and don't want to create a new flag for this purpose, so instead we'll just use the read only flag in way that doesn't seem to have anything to do with read only.
Of course the day Microsoft starts to make perfect sense to me, I might have to look into getting some psychological therapy.
Kenneniah said:
> To me that means, hey we're lazy and don't want to create a new flag for this purpose, so instead we'll just use the read only flag in way that doesn't seem to have anything to do with read only.
I don't think being lazy was the reason. I think it was probably to keep backwards compatibility with older Windows Servers.
As for Read Only still being displayed on Vista Folder Property page when it is no longer meant to be set by the user that could lazy.
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: JamesCsslPosted on 2007-03-25 at 21:11:35ID: 18790667
Make sure you own the file, and if not, take ownership of it.