What can cause high urine sugar with low blood sugar.
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsWhat can cause sugar in but no sugar in blood?
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
According to my wife, she is a clinical chemist there are a number of possibilities, in order of frequency:
1. The bottle that contained the urine sample has not been cleaned properly and contained for instance lemonade before (hopefully) the urine.
2. Diabetes with high variability of blood sugar levels
3. Problably there are a few metobolism disorders that may have this as a symptom
The kidneys cant MAKE sugar, so any sugar in the urine MUST have come from the blood, or some contamination of the sample.
Most people have kidneys that start spilling sugar into the urine when it gets to around 150 to 200mg/dl.
Normal blood sugar levels are more in the range of 70 to 120, so under normal circumstances there should be no sugar excreted.
If there's sugar in the urine, and normal levels in the blood, then there must have been a sugar peak, probably after a large meal, and/or these particular kidneys have a low sugar spill threshold.
http://www.afraidtoask.com
try that maybe..
i think sugar and glucose can be treated as the same thing here. So try this:
http://www.anytestkits.com
IANAD
I'm reasonably confident this isn't metabolic. The vast majority of sugar metabolism happens upstream of the ureter (e.g. liver, muscle). And even if the kidney was "leaking" sugar, that would be very unlikely to reduce blood-sugar to zero (as someone said, you'd be dead).
So, three possibilities:
a) glycogen production is way up, but sugar is being lost somewhere beyond the ureter (i.e. bladder) <-- no clear diagnosis of this that I'm aware of.
b) bad assay
c) bacterial infection somewhere in the urinary tract that's converting some small molecules into sugar
You need to have the test replicated to rule out b) before worrying about a) or c) though.
I should draw your attention on the fact that the eventual amount of sugar in the urine (which is for normal persons in normal conditions 0 mg/l) is in fact some kind of an average over time.
The concentration in the blood can be considered as an immediate value.
Consider following example:
Someone has for some reason a high amount of sugar in the blood. This causes sugar to go in the urine (which stays in the bladder). A bit later he does intensive sports, or has an injection of insuline. Blood sugar drops to normal values. In the mean time the urine with the sugar is still in the bladder. Some time after that both blood and urine are controlled. The measurement for the blood shows normal levels. The urine sample (which still contains the sugar as the person concerned did not go to toilet in the mean time) is measured as having too much sugar.
Hope this helps
A typical symptom of diabetes Type II is a high concentration of glucose in the urine, but is not consistent with low blood sugar.
Renal Tubular disease can cause both high levels of glucose in the urine and low blood sugar.
This is according to my wife’s schoolbooks; you should look in to “Renal Tubular disease”.
Not a doctor either but a recently diagnosed Type II diabetic. Type I is the type that people have all their lives or from an accident or something that destroys their ability to make insulin. Type II has three causes: 1) insulin output has decreased; 2) glucose from the liver is to high (yes, your liver can dump glucose into the blood if it detects you need it); and, 3) the cells in the body become insulin intolerant (takes more insulin before the cells can use the sugar).
Noone has mentioned an A1C test. This is a blood test that must to be sent to a laboratory. Here's how it works: glucose (crystals or molecules - I forget) in the blood attach to the hemoglobin. The hemoglobin cells live about three months. In the laboratory the technician using a microscope looks at a slide of your blood. By estimating the age of the hemoglobin cells and counting how much sugar is attached they come up with a number.
A normal person's A1C test result is usually 5-6. My first one was 13, ouch. My blood sugar was running 400-500 mg/dL (milligrams per deci-Liter).
The doctor put me on 1500 calorie diabetic diet, pills and mild execise. My blood glucose, now, is usually in the high normal range and I have been losing about a week. If I get my weight under control there is a good chance I will not need pills.
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: GwynforWebPosted on 2005-02-07 at 22:59:33ID: 13251899
If you have zero blood sugar your are probably dead /cpi95-96/ Projects/w ellness/bl ood- sugar. html
http://www.cs.odu.edu/~cpi