Access the answers to your technology questions today.
Subscribe Now
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
What Makes Experts Exchange Unique?
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.
Try it out and discover for yourself.
Subscribe Now
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the Community
Give a Little. Get a Lot.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
Join the Community
by: grg99Posted on 2006-01-05 at 09:53:55ID: 15620767
We tried to answer this question before.
The size of the guardbands depends on MANY technical and economic and environmental variables. Here are some of them:
(1) The guarbands have to be wide enough so the receiver doesnt hear much or any of of the adjacent channels.
(2) Now receiver filters are not very expensive anymore, so sharp filters are not a big concern, BUT the shaerper the
filter, the more phase-shift there is near the edges. So you don't want a filter with extremely steep edges if
you need a low phase shift data stream. There is a basic tradeoff beween adjacent channel rejection and phase shift
in channel. You usually have to come up with some compromise.
(3) Also guardbands are partially there to get you away from adjacent channel distortion products. If a transmitter isnt
super-pure in its modulation scheme, harmonics of the modulating frequency can cause extra sidebands, widening
the transmitter bandwidth. Also in phase and frequency modulation, the theoretical sidebands go off forever in both
directions, so you have to know how wide the transmitter output filter is.
(4) Also in the real world transmitters and receivers drift somewhat in frequency, due to crystal aging, temperature, and other factors.
You need extra guardbands to allow for these drifts. For example, a taxi radio working in Alaska is going to undergo a temperature range from -50C to +30C every year. Even with a 10 parts per million per degree xtal, that's a lot of drift, not to mention drift from aging, potholes, and component drift.
(5) Finally in most jurisdictions the federal radio agency sets up frequency spacings for each frequecy band, AND the signal bandwidths, AND the adjacent channel splatter, AND the guardbands, otherwise all would be chaos.
So you may not even have a choice, you'll have to use the mandated channel spacings, which will determine your transmitter bandwidth, once you decide how much of a guardband you can engineer. Or if the signal badwidth is legislated, you have even less choice.
Hope this helps.