Hmm, ok. I think a) is easier to understand conceptually. But parts b and c require more rigorous math, which is what I'm stuck on... Any more help on those parts are appreciated! Thanks in advance.
Main Topics
Browse All TopicsCalling all Math and CS Theory wizards, here's an algorithm question that I need help with. This would require use of recurrence and divide and conquer strategy:
There are n supposedly identical VLSI chips that in principle are capable of testing each other. Each chip tests the other and reports whether it is good or bad. A good chip always reports accurately whether the other chip is good or bad, but the answer of a bad chip cannot be trusted. Thus, the four possible outcomes of a test are as follows:
Chip A says Chip B says Conclusion
B is good A is good both are good, or both are bad
B is good A is bad at least one is bad
B is bad A is good at least one is bad
B is bad A is bad at least one is bad
a. Show that if more than n/2 chips are bad, we cannot necessarily determine which chips are good using any strategy based on this kind of pairwise test. Assume that the bad chips can conspire to fool the the tester.
b. Consider the problem of finding a single good chip from among n chips, assuming that more than n/2 of the chips are good. Show that floor(n/2) pairwise tests are sufficient to reduce the problem to one of nearly half the size.
c. Show that the good chips can be identified with Theta(n) pairwise tests, assuming that more than n/2 of the chips are good. Give and solve the recurrence that describes the number of tests.
This Question has been solved and asker verified All Experts Exchange premium technology solutions are available to subscription members.
Experts Exchange has been collecting answers to technology questions since 1996…3 million and counting! If you have a question, chances are we already have your answer.
If you can't find the exact answer you're looking for, ask our exclusive community of 50,000 experts. You’ll get a personalized answer from a trusted professional.
Thousands of free tech tips, tricks, how-to’s and tutorials are available in our peer reviewed articles section. See for yourself how smart our experts are, no login required.
Access the answers to your technology questions today.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Members of the expert community talk about why the experience at Experts Exchange is different than what you will find anywhere else.

Try it out and discover for yourself.
30-day free trial. Register in 60 seconds.
Join the community of experts here and help other tech pros by answering question in your area of expertise. You can earn FREE access to all Experts Exchange's premium features and resources.
Business Accounts
Answer for Membership
by: ozoPosted on 2008-10-06 at 22:11:21ID: 22656706
if more than n/2 chips are bad. a possible outcome is all bad chips report other bad chips as good, and good chips as bad
this is indistinguishable from the result if all the bad were good and all the good were bad.