ie7,
In the case of the uranium and plutonium bombs used for Hiroshima and Nagasaki, there were several factors at work. First of all, the total amount of radioactive material used was relatively small (64kg of uranium for Little Boy, estimated 6.2 kilograms of plutonium in Fat Man). Second, the bombs were both detonated in the air. In a bomb blast of either material, some portion of the material is consumed as a function of the explosion itself; the remaining material is widely distributed in the air, sucked up in the column of heat and smoke, and much of it is carried downwind and dispersed. Following the neutron bombardment of the target area that results from the exposion, some additional radioactive material is actually created, but it typically has a short half-life, and decays rapidly.
In the case of the Chernobyl incident, the total amount of radiation released is estimated at four hundred times more that that of the bombs dropped on Japan. The total amount of material present in the reactor was many orders of magnitude higher than that used in the two bombs. The Chernobyl incident had several mechanisms of release, including the initial explosion, subsequent chemical explosions, ongoing fire, etc, which led to many different types of material with different half-lives and uptake (absorption) patterns in animals being released.
I hope that helps clarify things.
Cheers,
LHerrou
Main Topics
Browse All Topics





by: gtworekPosted on 2009-09-13 at 09:23:00ID: 25320764
Russian case was not an explosion. The nuclear reactor melt down and caused gigantic fire of graphite used inside reactor. Such fire caused generation of radioactive gases which spreaded across all Europe. Graphite was not present at all during WWII explosions. ki/Chernob yl_disaste r for really deep explanations.
Look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wi