|
[x]
Posted via EE Mobile
|
|
| Search, ask, and monitor your questions on the go with EE Mobile. Visit Experts Exchange from your mobile device and never be out of touch again. |
|
|
|
|
Asked by BigRat in Philosophy & Religion
In Graphixer's thread on Creationism, MrPete claimed that the inclusion of the "supernatural" (as he put it) into scientific investigations was "good" Science. Thus things like IDism and Young Earth Creationism should be considered as science, and indeed, GOOD Science.
My question is what is good Science and how is MrPete's position justifiable?
20091111-EE-VQP-92 - Hierarchy / EE_QW_3_20080625