In numerous recent decisions the Supreme Court is very often criticized, rarely critically acclaimed, often 'evenly' split, viewed less supremely, more supine if not benign.
§ Which do you agree with?
§ Which do you disagree with?
° Which do you really care less about (than others)?
¤ Are you supportive of (all) the decisions anyway?
§ How are the presidential candidates handling this issues?
° Do you approve?
Please let us not revisit and rehash yet again the older 'controversial' ones (been there done that), like Roe v. Wade, feel welcome to do that separately.
I hesitate to ask what should be done (ex: vote) or why it is going this way (sounds more philisophical, I'd like to push this as having more political bent, about one of the three main branches of a check-and-balance system).
How about we do ten examples (decimal), and try to count/track your own pro/con choices. Or at least eight to get a byte out of the bits.
With participation, I predict the sum to be more of balance than many may think, and some surprise for some.
Although as asker, I prefer to question than answer, so please give more answers than questions, unless of course you do not mind sounding like you are not an American. I'll try to put up up to half to help get it going.
OK then, find us ten decisions, try to address within reason what those decisons were, and their reasoning (not so much the lack thereof) and declare one side of the issue, a pro or a con. You may rate them at will. I doubt you'll convince anyone, but if you agree with someone, that does not mean that you must remain a lurker.
OK, here is one -
(1) Gun COntrol
Court says guns are not only for States ('militia'), but regular people can have them as well, according to the Constitution of the United States of America.
Obama - pro
McCain - con
SunBow - pro
Start Free Trial
